McBride et al v. First California Mortgage Company et al
Filing
36
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS HAVE NOT BEEN SERVED PROPERLY. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 5/30/2013 01:30 PM. Show Cause Response due by 5/24/2013.Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/26/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
8
9
No. C 12-04054 RS
GREGORY S. MCBRIDE and CONCETTA
MCBRIDE,
12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENDANTS HAVE NOT BEEN
SERVED PROPERLY
Plaintiffs,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
v.
13
AURORA SERVICING COMPANY et al..,
14
Defendants.
____________________________________/
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Plaintiffs have twice moved for entry of default against the three defendants who have not
yet appeared in this case. That request has been denied by the Clerkâs Office twice. Upon receiving
notice of declination of entry of default, plaintiff has neither sought to correct the problem in service
nor moved for reconsideration of the declination. Accordingly, plaintiffs are ordered to show cause
why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs are hereby directed to file a
written response to this order by May 24, 2013 explaining why defendants have not yet been served
properly. A hearing will be held to determine whether good cause has been shown on May 30, 2013
at 1:30 p.m. Failure to respond to this order will result in dismissal of this action.
The Case Management Conference scheduled for May 2, 2013 is hereby vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 4/26/13
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
1
No. C 12-04054 RS
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?