Koehler v. Litehouse, Inc.

Filing 42

ORDER, Motions terminated: 41 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Garrett Koehler filed by Garrett Koehler.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 1/8/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2013)

Case3:12-cv-04055-SI Document40 Filed01/04/13 Page1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GARRETT KOEHLER, as
an individual, and on behalf ,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
LITEHOUSE, INC., an
,
Idaho corporation,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/

CASE NO. ______________________
12-cv-4055-SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Mediation
✔
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
JAMS, San Francisco, CA
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
✔
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9

other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________
1/3/2013

____________________________
/s/ Benjamin M. Lopatin
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________
1/3/2013

____________________________
/s/ Hayes Michel
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

Case3:12-cv-04055-SI Document40 Filed01/04/13 Page2 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
9
9

Dated: 1/8/13

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
DISTRICT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2