Koehler v. Litehouse, Inc.

Filing 42

ORDER, Motions terminated: 41 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Garrett Koehler filed by Garrett Koehler.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 1/8/13. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-04055-SI Document40 Filed01/04/13 Page1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GARRETT KOEHLER, as an individual, and on behalf , Plaintiff(s), v. LITEHOUSE, INC., an , Idaho corporation, Defendant(s). _______________________________/ CASE NO. ______________________ 12-cv-4055-SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Mediation ✔ 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ JAMS, San Francisco, CA _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ✔ 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) 9 other requested deadline _____________________________________________ Dated:___________ 1/3/2013 ____________________________ /s/ Benjamin M. Lopatin Attorney for Plaintiff Dated:____________ 1/3/2013 ____________________________ /s/ Hayes Michel Attorney for Defendant CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE Case3:12-cv-04055-SI Document40 Filed01/04/13 Page2 of 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER 9 9 Dated: 1/8/13 The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________________ The Honorable Susan Illston DISTRICT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?