Roussel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 32

ORDER re 31 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 29 Order on Ex Parte Application To Extend Briefing Schedule and Continue Hearing on Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Reset Deadlines Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. Responses due by 10/10/2012. Replies due by 10/12/2012. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 10/17/2012 03:00 PM.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/5/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 ERIC ROUSSEL, an individual, CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-04057-CRB [The Honorable Charles R. Breyer Plaintiff, 12 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUE HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION vs. 13 14 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. A/K/A WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF 15 WELLS FARGO BANK N.A. AND F/K/A WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB; NDEX 16 WEST LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; and all persons or entities unknown 17 claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien or interest in the property described 18 in this Complaint adverse to Plaintiff’s title thereto, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 19 Defendants. 20 The Court, having reviewed the Stipulation To Extend Briefing Schedule and Continue 21 22 Hearing on Order to Show Cause Re: Preliminary Injunction and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, 23 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION hereby orders: 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 93000/FR0491/00502162-1 1 CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-04057-CRB ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON OSC RE: PRELIM. INJ. 1 The hearing on the order to show cause re: preliminary injunction be continued to 2 October 17, 2012 at 3p.m., with the opposition due on October 10, 2012 by 5:00 p.m. and the 3 reply, if any, due on October 12, 2012. RT 9 J ER 11 A H 10 R NIA . Breyer arles R udge Ch NO 8 IT IS S FO 7 HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER D UNITED ORDERE O STATES DISTRICT JUDGE LI 6 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 5 Dated: October 5, 2012 S IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 4 N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR0491/00502162-1 2 CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-04057-CRB ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON OSC RE: PRELIM. INJ. 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to this action. 3 I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business address is Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600, Pasadena, 4 California 91101-2459. 5 6 7 On the date below, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUE HEARING ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 8 on the interested parties in said case as follows: 9 Served Electronically Via the Court’s CM/ECF System: 10 Counsel for Plaintiff: 11 September J. Katjie, Esq. Consumer Litigation Law Center, APC 100 N. Barranca, Suite 700 West Covina, CA 91791 Tel: 800.787.5616; Fax: 888.909.7647 sk@consumerlitigationlawcenter.com 12 13 14 15 Counsel for Defendant NDeX West, LLC: Edward A. Treder, Esq. BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER & WEISS, LLP 20955 Pathfinder Road, Suite 300 Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Tel: 626.915.5714; Fax: 909.595.7640 edwardt@bdfgroup.com 16 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the 18 Bar of this Court, at whose direction the service was made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California on October 5, 2012. 19 17 20 21 Carol Goodwin /s/ Carol Goodwin (Type or Print Name) (Signature of Declarant) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR0491/00502162-1 CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-04057-CRB CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?