Hobbs et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 43

ORDER (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10
11 TRACY HOBBS AND RODNEY HOBBS,

CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-04060-RS

12

[The Honorable Richard Seeborg]

13

Plaintiffs,
v.

ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON APPLICATION FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

14
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. successor in
15 interest to WACHOVIA BANK N.A., F/K/A
WORLD SAVINGS BANK FSB; NDEX
16 WEST LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
17 Company; and all persons or entities unknown
claiming any legal or equitable right, title,
18 estate, lien or interest in the property described
in this complaint adverse to Plaintiffs’ title
19 thereto, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive,
20

(MODIFIED BY THE COURT)

Defendants.

21
22
23

On November 16, 2012, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor by merger with Wells

24 Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a World Savings Bank, FSB
25 (“Wells Fargo”) filed a response to this Court’s November 15, 2012 Order Re: Briefing On
26 Application For Temporary Restraining Order.
27
28 / / /

93000/FR0483/00477107-1

1

CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-04060-RS
ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

1

The Court, having read and considered the response and the declaration in support, finds

2 as follows:
3

Wells Fargo’s request that the Court extend the Defendant’s briefing deadline is

4 GRANTED, as modified.
5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

6

No later than Noon on Wednesday, November 21, 2012, defendants shall file any

7 opposition to the application for a temporary restraining order. With the exception of the newly
8 modified deadline, the opposition, if filed, shall conform to the requirements of this Court’s
9 November 15, 2012 Order Re Briefing On Application For Temporary Restraining Order
10 (Document 41). Plaintiffs' deadline for its further filing required by the November 15th Order is
11 extended to the same date and time. Particularly in light of the holidays, the parties are still
12 strongly encouraged to reach agreement as to a further postponement of the foreclosure sale that
13 would permit careful and full consideration of the question of whether or not the sale should be
14 enjoined during the pendency of this action.
15
16
17 Dated: 11/16/2012
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

93000/FR0483/00477107-1

2

CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-04060-RS
ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER