Hobbs et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 58

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 57 TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Motion Hearing set for 1/3/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/17/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 TRACY HOBBS AND RODNEY HOBBS, CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-04060-RS 12 [The Honorable Richard Seeborg] 13 Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON OSC RE: PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 14 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. successor in 15 interest to WACHOVIA BANK N.A., F/K/A WORLD SAVINGS BANK FSB; NDEX 16 WEST LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability 17 Company; and all persons or entities unknown claiming any legal or equitable right, title, 18 estate, lien or interest in the property described in this complaint adverse to Plaintiffs’ title 19 thereto, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 The Court, having reviewed the Joint Stipulation to continue the hearing for order to 24 25 show cause re preliminary injunction and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 26 27 28 /// /// 93000/FR0483/00477107-1 1 CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-04060-RS ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF OSC RE PI 1 1. 2 3 The hearing on the preliminary injunction be continued from December 20, 2012 to January 3, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. 2. Wells Fargo’s deadline to file a response to plaintiffs’ papers in support of a 4 preliminary injunction is extended to December 21, 2012. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 12/17/12 HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/FR0483/00477107-1 2 CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-04060-RS ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF OSC RE PI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?