Hobbs et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
58
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 57 TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE ON PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. Motion Hearing set for 1/3/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/17/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11 TRACY HOBBS AND RODNEY HOBBS,
CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-04060-RS
12
[The Honorable Richard Seeborg]
13
Plaintiffs,
v.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING DATE ON OSC RE:
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
14
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. successor in
15 interest to WACHOVIA BANK N.A., F/K/A
WORLD SAVINGS BANK FSB; NDEX
16 WEST LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
17 Company; and all persons or entities unknown
claiming any legal or equitable right, title,
18 estate, lien or interest in the property described
in this complaint adverse to Plaintiffs’ title
19 thereto, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive,
20
Defendants.
21
22
23
The Court, having reviewed the Joint Stipulation to continue the hearing for order to
24
25
show cause re preliminary injunction and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
26
27
28
///
///
93000/FR0483/00477107-1
1
CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-04060-RS
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF OSC RE PI
1
1.
2
3
The hearing on the preliminary injunction be continued from December 20, 2012
to January 3, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.
2.
Wells Fargo’s deadline to file a response to plaintiffs’ papers in support of a
4
preliminary injunction is extended to December 21, 2012.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 Dated: 12/17/12
HONORABLE RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
93000/FR0483/00477107-1
2
CASE NO.: 3:12-CV-04060-RS
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF OSC RE PI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?