Bankruptcy Estate of Chien Hwa Leachman et al v. Harris et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER CHANGING TIME re 17 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Steven Stoltz, Michelle Harris, 10 MOTION to Dismiss COMPLAINT AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT. Responses due by 11/23/2012. Replies du e by 11/30/2012. Motion Hearing set for 12/14/2012 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Case Management Statement due by 1/11/2013. Case Management Conference set for 1/18/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on October 2, 2012. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2012)

_____________________________________________

1

Timothy J. Halloran 104498
J. Bart Flood 270697
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
88 Kearny Street, 10th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108-5530
Tel:
[phone]
Fax: [phone]
-

-

2
3
4
5
6

Attorneys for Defendant
STEVEN STOLTZ DBA STOLTZ FAMILY
LAW PRACTICE & MICHELLE HARRIS

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORHTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF CHIEN HWA
LEACHMAN, AKA CHIEN HWA WANG,
CHIEN HWA WANG-LEACHMAN by ARTHUR
BRUNSWASSER, Authorized Agent,

Case No.: CV-12-4072 (EMC)
IPROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATED

REQUEST

FOR

ORDER CHANGING

TIME

Plaintiff,

13

[Pursuant to L.R. 6-21
14

v.

15

MICHELLE HARRIS, STEVEN STOLTZ DBA
STOLTZ FAMILY LAW PRACTICE, DOES 1
THROUGH 20, INCLUSIVE,

Courtroom: Courtroom 5 17th Floor
Judge:
Hon. Edward M. Chen
-

16
17

Defendants.

18
19
20

Pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Northern District of California,

21

Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF CHIEN HWA LEACHMAN, AKA CHIEN

22

HWA WANG, CHIEN HWA WANG-LEACHMAN by ARTHUR BRUNSWASSER (“Plaintiff’),

23

Authorized Agent, and Defendants MICHELLE HARRIS AND STEVEN STOLTZ DBA STOLTZ

24

FAMILY LAW PRACTICE (“Attorneys”), submitted a stipulated request to change to time.

25

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

26

(1) The hearing date on Attorney’s motion under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”)

27

12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint, currently set for October 26, 2012 at 1:30 p.m., is moved to
14
December 7, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor of the San Francisco Courthouse, 450

28

ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF TIME

Case No.: CV-12-4072 (EMC)

-

1

_____________________

1

Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102.

2

(2) Corresponding with the hearing date on Attorney’s FRCP 1 2(b)(6) motion being

3

rescheduled for December 7, 2012, Plaintiffs papers in opposition to Attorney’s FRCP 12(b)(6),

4

originally due on October 3, 2012, will now be due on November 23, 2012. Thereafter, Attorney’s

5

reply papers in support of the 1 2(b)(6) motion, currently due on October 10, 2012, will now be due on

6

November 30, 2012.
(3) The Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for November 15, 2012, is

7
8

rescheduled to January 18, 2013.

9
10

(4) The dates set forth in the Court’s order setting initial case management conference and ADR
deadlines (Dkt. No. 2) are modified as follows:

11

(a) The last day to meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process

12

selection, and discovery plan; last day to file ADR certification; and last to file either Stipulation to

13

ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference; all currently set for October 10, 2012, are

14

rescheduled for December 28, 2012.

15

(b) The last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete with initial disclosures and joint

16

Case Management Statement; both currently set for October 24, 2012, are rescheduled for January 11,

17

2013.

18
19

DATED: October 2, 2012

20
21
By

22

Hon. Edward M. Chen
United States District Court
Northern District of California

23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF TIME

Case No.: CV-12-4072 (EMC)

-

2