Vass v. JP Morgan Chase, NA

Filing 20

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Show Cause Response due by 10/29/2012.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/17/12. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2012)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 12-04094 WHA

IRA VASS,
Plaintiff,
v.

SECOND ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE

JP MORGAN CHASE NA,
Defendant.
/

13
14

Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., erroneously sued as JP Morgan Chase, NA,

15

filed a motion to dismiss pro se plaintiff Ira Vass’ complaint on September 4, 2012. Pursuant to

16

Civil Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition thereto was due

17

September 18, 2012. None was filed. On October 4, plaintiff was ordered to show cause why

18

her claims against defendant should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff’s

19

response was due by noon on October 15. No response was received.

20

Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the case should not be dismissed for failure to

21

prosecute. Plaintiff must file a written response to this order by NOON ON OCTOBER 29, 2012.

22

If no response is filed, defendant’s motion to dismiss may be granted.

23

The hearing, currently set for 8 A.M. ON NOVEMBER 8, 2012, shall remain in place.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: October 17, 2012.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE