Vass v. JP Morgan Chase, NA

Filing 21

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Show Cause Response due by 11/15/2012.. Signed by Judge Alsup on 10/31/12. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2012)

1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3
4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6

IRA VASS,
Plaintiff,

7
8
9

v.
THIRD ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
JP MORGAN CHASE NA,
Defendant.

10

/

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

No. C 12-04094 WHA

12

Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., erroneously sued as JP Morgan Chase, NA,

13

filed a motion to dismiss pro se plaintiff Ira Vass’ complaint on September 4, 2012. Pursuant to

14

Civil Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition thereto was due

15

September 18. None was filed. By order dated October 4, plaintiff was ordered to show cause

16

why her claims against defendant should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (Dkt. No. 17).

17

Plaintiff’s response was due by October 15. No response was received. A second order to show

18

cause issued, the response to which was due by noon on October 29 (Dkt. No. 20). That date has

19

come and gone, and no response has been received. Both orders to show cause warned that if no

20

response was received, the motion to dismiss may be granted.

21

Defendant’s motion to dismiss has been pending for nearly two months. Plaintiff will be

22

given one final opportunity to respond. Plaintiff’s response is due by NOON ON NOVEMBER 15.

23

If no response is filed, defendant’s motion to dismiss may be granted and/or the action may be

24

dismissed for failure to prosecute. The hearing, currently set for November 8, 2012, is hereby

25
26
27
28

VACATED.

The case management conference, currently set for the same date, shall be continued

to 11 A.M. ON NOVEMBER 29.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 31, 2012.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE