Cement & Concrete Workers District Council Pension Fund v. Hewlett Packard Company et al

Filing 81

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING re 70 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint filed by Mark A. Hurd; 68 MOTION to Dismiss The Second Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Hewlett-Packard Company. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 4, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 CEMENT & CONCRETE WORKERS DISTRICT COUNCIL PENSION FUND, et al., Plaintiffs, 9 v. 10 11 HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, et al., Case No. 12-cv-04115-JST ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING Re: ECF Nos. 68, 70 United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. 14 ECF Nos. 68, 70. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), 15 the Court finds that the parties’ briefs have thoroughly addressed the issues, rendering the matter 16 suitable for disposition without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for 17 March 13, 2014, is hereby VACATED. 18 However, if any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 19 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 20 been licensed to practice law for four or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 21 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 22 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 23 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 24 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 4, 2014 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?