Design Data Corporation v. Unigate Enterprise, Inc. et al

Filing 93

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CHANGE TIME. The hearing on defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is moved to Friday July 18, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. Defendants' Reply brief is due June 30, 2014. Counsel are ORDERED to meet and confer by Tuesday J une 10, 2014 about re-designating the material referenced in Doc. 88 as confidential. If counsel cannot agree to re-designate the material as confidential, plaintiff shall file a response and declaration by Thursday, June 12, 2014, explaining why a confidential designation would not be adequate. On or before Wednesday June 11, 2014, defendants shall file a declaration in accordance with Civ. Local Rule 79-5 establishing that the materials they designated as confidential that plaintiff has rel ied on in its Opposition brief and supporting exhibits (see Korpus Decl. in Support of Plaintiffs Motion, Docket No. 85 -1) should be filed under seal. Before Wednesday June 11, 2014, plaintiff shall file a declaration establishing that the material it designated as confidential and relied on by defendants in Docket No. 88 , should be filed under seal under the applicable standard. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/06/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DESIGN DATA CORPORATION, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 v. UNIGATE ENTERPRISE, INC., et al., Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 12-cv-04131-WHO ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CHANGE TIME Re: Dkt. Nos. 88, 90 I have reviewed defendants’ request to continue the hearing on their Motion for Summary 12 13 Judgment for three weeks and to allow defendants three additional weeks to file their Reply in 14 support of that Motion. I have also reviewed plaintiff’s Opposition to that request. Defendants’ request is GRANTED. The hearing on defendants’ Motion for Summary 15 16 Judgment is moved to Friday July 18, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. Defendants’ Reply brief is due June 30, 17 2014. 18 Defendants also ask the Court to de-designate “as Confidential – Attorneys Eyes Only” 19 specific emails produced by plaintiff, so that defense counsel can show them to their clients. 20 Docket No. 88. I have not had the benefit of plaintiff’s response on the merits to this issue but it 21 is not obvious why these emails – purportedly sent by representatives of plaintiff to defendants – 22 merit an AEO designation. Any confidential information would seem to be adequately protected 23 by a “confidential” designation under the Protective Order. Accordingly, counsel are ORDERED 24 to meet and confer by Tuesday June 10, 2014 about re-designating the material as confidential. 25 If counsel cannot agree to re-designate the material as confidential, plaintiff shall file a response 26 and declaration by Thursday, June 12, 2014 explaining why a confidential designation would not 27 be adequate. 28 The Court also has before it two Administrative Motions to File Under Seal. Docket 1 Nos.85, 88. On or before Wednesday June 11, 2014, defendants shall file a declaration in 2 accordance with Civ. Local Rule 79-5 establishing that the materials they designated as 3 confidential that plaintiff has relied on in its Opposition brief and supporting exhibits (see Korpus 4 Decl. in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion, Docket No. 85-1) should be filed under seal. Defendants 5 shall articulate reasons, supported by specific facts, showing that compelling reasons exist for 6 sealing the material that outweigh the public’s right of access. Kamakana v. City & County of 7 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 Similarly, on or before Wednesday June 11, 2014, plaintiff shall file a declaration establishing that the material it designated as confidential and relied on by defendants in Docket No. 88, should be filed under seal under the applicable standard. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 6, 2014 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?