Villalpando v. Exel Direct Inc. et al
Filing
43
ORDER GRANTING re 42 Letter filed by DHL Express (USA), Inc., DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc, Exel Direct Inc. Case Management Statement due by 8/16/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 8/23/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 4/8/13. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2013)
www.scopelitis.com
2 North Lake Avenue
Suite 460
Pasadena, CA 91101
Main (626) 795-4700
Fax (626) 795-4790
The full service transportation law firm
CHRISTOPHER C. McNATT, JR.
cmcnatt@scopelitis.com
April 5, 2013
Via E-Filing
Honorable Joseph C. Spero
United States District Court
Northern District of California
450 Golden Gate Avenue, Courtroom G - 15th Floor
San Francisco, California 94102
Re:
Daniel Villalpando v. Exel Direct, Inc., et al.
USDC Case No. C 12-04137 JCS
Dear Judge Spero:
The undersigned counsel for the defendants has conferred with counsel for
plaintiff regarding the Case Management Conference set for April 12, 2013, and
the parties respectfully submit the following joint letter to apprise the Court of
the status of the above-captioned matter.
Due to unanticipated calendar conflicts in three other class action matters
(including a major appellate briefing in the California Second District Court of
Appeal, a class certification motion in federal district court for the Eastern
District of Louisiana, and ongoing motion practice and discovery in a certified
class action in the Central District of California), counsel for plaintiff (Guy
Wallace) has advised that his office will not be available for the presently
scheduled May 3, 2013 mediation before Mark Rudy. Mr. Wallace is willing to
provide a Declaration to the Court discussing the foregoing difficulties and
constraints if the Court deems it to be necessary, and regrets any burden on
the Court’s schedule herein.
Counsel are advised that Mr. Rudy’s next available dates for mediation, which
will meet counsels’ and the parties’ schedules, fall in July and August of 2013
and, thus, the parties jointly request that the April 12, 2013 Case Management
Conference be continued to late August 2013 and that the parties be allowed to
complete the mediation prior to the reset Case Management Conference.
Further, the parties agree that it would be appropriate and efficient to address
the pretrial schedule including the schedule on any motion for class
certification if and when mediation efforts are unsuccessful.
Guy Wallace, counsel for plaintiff, has reviewed and approved this letter and
confirms that the request herein for a continuance of the Case Management
Conference is a joint request.
Indianapolis Chicago Washington, D.C. Los Angeles Chattanooga Detroit Spokane Dallas/Fort Worth
■
■
■
■
■
■
■
SERVICES OUTSIDE CALIFORNIA AND MICHIGAN PROVIDED BY SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
SERVICES IN MICHIGAN PROVIDED BY SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
SERVICES IN CALIFORNIA PROVIDED BY SCOPELITIS, GARVIN, LIGHT, HANSON & FEARY, LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP
Honorable Joseph C. Spero
April 5, 2013
Page 2 of 2
If the Case Management Conference does go forward on April 12, 2013, the
undersigned counsel requests permission to appear by telephone and will be
available at the time of the conference at 626-345-5020.
The parties thank the Court for its attention to this matter.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Christopher C. McNatt, Jr.
Christopher C. McNatt, Jr.
4834-1605-4547, v. 2
RT
A
H
ER
pero
FO
NO
ph C. S
se
Judge Jo
R NIA
ERED
O ORD D
IT IS S
DIFIE
AS MO
LI
UNIT
ED
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT that the case mangement conference, set for April 12, 2013,
at 1:30 PM, is hereby continued to August 23, 2013, at 1:30 PM. Updated joint case management
conference statement shall be due by August 16, 2013.
Dated: April 8, 2013
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?