Rincon v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
Filing
10
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 9 Stipulation selecting Mediation (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Melanie Rincon
CASE NO. C12-04158 MEJ
Plaintiff(s),
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
V.
AFSCME
Defendant(s).
I
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
J
I1
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
In
ivate Process:
Private ADR (please identify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
R the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
V
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
LI
other requested deadline
Dated: 10/17/2012
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: 10/17/12
(I
Attorney for Defendant
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSEDJ ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
R NIA
October 17, 2012
UNIT
ED
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
X
A
H
ER
LI
RT
FO
NO
UNITED STATESia-Elena James
MAGISTRATEJTJDGE
r
dge Ma
Ju
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."
Rev. 12/Il
Page 2 o12
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?