Ramirez v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James granting 30 Stipulation selecting Private ADR (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO. C 12 4192 MEJ
REVISED STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR
AETNA LIFE INSRUANCE COMPANY ,
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Parties are agreeing to use
Martin Quinn of JAMS for a mediation to take place in January 2013.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
/s/ Corinne Chandler
Attorney for Plaintiff
/s/ Jordan S. Altura
Attorney for Defendant
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 6, 2012
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
D IS T IC T O
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?