Jiau v. Poole et al

Filing 22

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION 16 17 21 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 2/8/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

WINIFRED JIAU,

9

Petitioner,

10

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR
RECONSIDERATION

v.

11

RANDY TEWS, warden,

12
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

No. 12-4193 SI (pr)

Respondent.
/

13
14

The court dismissed this action without prejudice because petitioner had not exhausted

15

her Bureau of Prisons administrative remedies before filing her petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

16

Petitioner has moved for reconsideration of the dismissal, arguing that it will be futile to attempt

17

to exhaust administrative remedies. Her motions for reconsideration are DENIED. (Docket #

18

16 and # 21.) As the court explained in the order of dismissal, further development of the record

19

by way of the administrative appeals process would be particularly helpful in this case.

20

Petitioner is reminded that, after she exhausts her administrative remedies, she may file a new

21

action.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED.
(Docket # 17.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: February 8, 2013
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge