Rovi Solutions Corporation v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.

Filing 25

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 23 TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION DATE FOR DEFENDANT LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS OF INDIRECT AND WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/14/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2012)

1
2
3
4

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737)
[e-mail]
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

5
6
7
8
9

Joseph M. Paunovich (Bar No. 228222)
[e-mail]
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Rovi Solutions Corporation

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

13
14

ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, a
Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,

15
16

vs.

17

LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., a
Delaware corporation,

18

CASE NO. 12-cv-04209-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE OPPOSITION
DATE FOR DEFENDANT LENOVO
(UNITED STATES) INC.’S MOTION TO
DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS OF
INDIRECT AND WILLFUL
INFRINGEMENT

Defendant.

19
20
21

WHEREAS, defendant Lenovo (United States) Inc. filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s

22

Claims of Indirect and Willful Infringement pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) on August 31,

23

2012 (Dkt. No. 8);

24
25
26
27

WHEREAS, plaintiff Rovi Solutions Corporation’s (“Rovi”) current deadline to respond
under the local rules is Friday, September 14;
WHEREAS, plaintiff Rovi has requested 14 additional days to respond in light of its
recent hiring of new counsel to represent it in this litigation;
02435.52069/4960235.1

28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON
CONTINUANCE OF BRIEFING ON MOTION TO
DISMISS INDIRECT AND WILLFUL
INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS

Case No.: 3:12-cv-04209-RS

1

WHEREAS, Defendant Lenovo (United States) Inc. has consented to Rovi’s request to

2

continue the deadline for responding by 14 days, thus extending the opposition deadline to

3

September 28;

4
5
6

WHEREAS, Defendant Lenovo, with Rovi’s consent, intends to re-notice the hearing of
its motion to dismiss to November 8, 2012, in light of the recent reassignment of the action;
It is therefore stipulated between the Parties that, subject to the approval of the Court, the

7

deadline for Rovi to file its Opposition is September 28, 2012, and Lenovo (United States) will

8

file and serve its reply in accordance with Civil LR 7-3(c) pursuant to this extended opposition

9

deadline.

10
11

Respectfully submitted,

DATED: September 13, 2012

/s/ Joseph Paunovich_____________
Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737)
[e-mail]
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

/s/ Megan Whyman Olesek by Permission
Douglas E. Ringel (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Yariv Waks (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
1500 K Street N.W., Suite 700
Washington, D.C. 20005
Telephone
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Joseph M. Paunovich (Bar No. 228222)
[e-mail]
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Rovi Solutions
Corp.

John Flock (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
One Broadway
New York, NY 10004
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Megan Whyman Olesek (Bar No. 191218)
[e-mail]
1801 Page Mill Road, Suite 210
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1216
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

24
25

Attorneys for Defendant Lenovo (United States)
Inc.

26
27
28

02435.52069/4960235.1
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON
CONTINUANCE OF BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
INDIRECT AND WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS

Case No.: 3:12-cv-04209-RS

1
2

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L. R. 5-1
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of

3

perjury that the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from its signatories.

4

DATED: September 13, 2012

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

5
6
7
8

By: /s/ Joseph M. Paunovich
Joseph M. Paunovich
Attorneys for Plaintiff ROVI SOLUTIONS
CORPORATION

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

02435.52069/4960235.1
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON
CONTINUANCE OF BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
INDIRECT AND WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS

Case No.: 3:12-cv-04209-RS

1

ORDER

2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5

9/14
Dated: __________, 2012

By: ___________________________________
Hon. Richard Seeborg

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

02435.52069/4960235.1
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ON
CONTINUANCE OF BRIEFING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
INDIRECT AND WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS

Case No.: 3:12-cv-04209-RS