Hansen v. City of San Francisco et al
Filing
55
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 54 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL DEADLINES filed by City of San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 26, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2014)
1 Dennis J. Herrera (SBN: 139669)
City Attorney
2 Elizabeth Salveson (SBN: 83788)
Chief Labor Attorney
3 Lisa B. Berkowitz (SBN 167657)
Deputy City Attorney
4 1390 Market Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94102
5 Telephone: 415-554-3825
Facsimile: 415-554-4248
6 lisa.berkowitz@sfgov.org
7 Arthur A. Hartinger (SBN: 121521)
ahartinger@meyersnave.com
8 Matthew J. Weinberg (SBN: 275728)
mweinberg@meyersnave.com
9 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON
575 Market Street, Suite 2080
10 San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 421-3711
11 Facsimile: (415) 421-3767
12 Attorneys for Defendant City and County of San
Francisco, Gregory P. Suhr and George Gascon
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17 GARED HANSEN,
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
20 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation;
21 GREGORY P. SUHR, individually and in his
official capacity as Chief of Police; GEORGE
22 GASCON, individually and in his official
capacity as former Chief of Police; and DOES
23 1 THROUGH 10, inclusive,
24
Case No. C 12-04210 JST
[PROPOSED]
STIPULATION AND ORDER
MODIFYING PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Trial Date:
April 28, 2014
Defendants.
25
26
WHEREAS, defendants’ motion for summary judgment was heard on March 13, 2014 and
27 is currently under submission; and
28
1
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Case No. C 12-4210 JST
1
WHEREAS, trial in this case is set to commence on April 28, 2013; and
2
WHEREAS, there are a number of imminent deadlines which require the parties to prepare
3 pretrial materials, with pretrial materials due to be filed on April 1, 2014; and
4
WHEREAS, the parties desire to conserve resources and to ensure that pretrial submissions
5 conform to the scope of the case after the Court issues its order on the pending Rule 56 motions;
6
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
7
1.
All pending pretrial deadlines are vacated pending the Court’s upcoming order on
8 Defendants’ Rule 56 motion.
9
2.
The Court will set a schedule with new deadlines, if necessary, after the Court
10 issues its order on Defendants’ Rule 56 motion.
11
12 DATED: March 20, 2014
MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON
13
By:
14
/s/ Arthur A. Hartinger
Arthur A. Hartinger
Attorneys for Defendant
15
16
17 DATED: March 20, 2014
GASPARD CASTILLO WINTER HARPER, APC
18
By:
19
/s/ Christopher L. Gaspard
Christopher L. Gaspard
Attorneys for Plaintiff
20
21
22
23
IT IS ORDERED.
Dated: March 26, 2014
____________________________
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL DEADLINES
Case No. C 12-4210 JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?