Hansen v. City of San Francisco et al

Filing 55

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 54 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL DEADLINES filed by City of San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 26, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2014)

Download PDF
1 Dennis J. Herrera (SBN: 139669) City Attorney 2 Elizabeth Salveson (SBN: 83788) Chief Labor Attorney 3 Lisa B. Berkowitz (SBN 167657) Deputy City Attorney 4 1390 Market Street, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102 5 Telephone: 415-554-3825 Facsimile: 415-554-4248 6 lisa.berkowitz@sfgov.org 7 Arthur A. Hartinger (SBN: 121521) ahartinger@meyersnave.com 8 Matthew J. Weinberg (SBN: 275728) mweinberg@meyersnave.com 9 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 575 Market Street, Suite 2080 10 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 421-3711 11 Facsimile: (415) 421-3767 12 Attorneys for Defendant City and County of San Francisco, Gregory P. Suhr and George Gascon 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 16 17 GARED HANSEN, 18 19 Plaintiff, v. 20 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation; 21 GREGORY P. SUHR, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police; GEORGE 22 GASCON, individually and in his official capacity as former Chief of Police; and DOES 23 1 THROUGH 10, inclusive, 24 Case No. C 12-04210 JST [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL DEADLINES Trial Date: April 28, 2014 Defendants. 25 26 WHEREAS, defendants’ motion for summary judgment was heard on March 13, 2014 and 27 is currently under submission; and 28 1 [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL DEADLINES Case No. C 12-4210 JST 1 WHEREAS, trial in this case is set to commence on April 28, 2013; and 2 WHEREAS, there are a number of imminent deadlines which require the parties to prepare 3 pretrial materials, with pretrial materials due to be filed on April 1, 2014; and 4 WHEREAS, the parties desire to conserve resources and to ensure that pretrial submissions 5 conform to the scope of the case after the Court issues its order on the pending Rule 56 motions; 6 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS: 7 1. All pending pretrial deadlines are vacated pending the Court’s upcoming order on 8 Defendants’ Rule 56 motion. 9 2. The Court will set a schedule with new deadlines, if necessary, after the Court 10 issues its order on Defendants’ Rule 56 motion. 11 12 DATED: March 20, 2014 MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON 13 By: 14 /s/ Arthur A. Hartinger Arthur A. Hartinger Attorneys for Defendant 15 16 17 DATED: March 20, 2014 GASPARD CASTILLO WINTER HARPER, APC 18 By: 19 /s/ Christopher L. Gaspard Christopher L. Gaspard Attorneys for Plaintiff 20 21 22 23 IT IS ORDERED. Dated: March 26, 2014 ____________________________ Honorable Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PRETRIAL DEADLINES Case No. C 12-4210 JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?