Strongco Trading Company, Ltd v. Pulse Shower Spas, Inc. et al

Filing 16

ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James denying 10 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying 10 Motion to Dismiss; denying 10 Motion to Strike (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2012)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

Northern District of California

6
7

STRONGCO TRADING COMPANY, LTD.,
Plaintiff,

8
v.

No. C 12-4222 MEJ
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DISMISS

9
PULSE SHOWER SPAS, INC., et al.,

Re: Docket No. 10

10
Defendants.
_____________________________________/

12
For the Northern District of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

13

On October 19, 2012, Plaintiff Strongco Trading Company, LTD filed a Motion to Dismiss

14

Defendants’ counterclaims. Dkt. No. 10. Although Defendants filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s

15

Motion, Plaintiff subsequently failed to file a reply brief pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7. Further,

16

upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion, the Court found it to be confusing and contradictory, and

17

informed Plaintiff that it was therefore inclined to deny it in its entirety. Dkt. No. 13. Accordingly,

18

the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why its Motion should not be denied as drafted. Id.

19

Having reviewed Plaintiff’s response (Dkt. No. 15), the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for

20

the reasons stated in Defendants’ opposition. No hearing is necessary. Civil Local Rule 7-1(b).

21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: November 26, 2012
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge