Strongco Trading Company, Ltd v. Pulse Shower Spas, Inc. et al

Filing 16

ORDER by Judge Maria-Elena James denying 10 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying 10 Motion to Dismiss; denying 10 Motion to Strike (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 Northern District of California 6 7 STRONGCO TRADING COMPANY, LTD., Plaintiff, 8 v. No. C 12-4222 MEJ ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS 9 PULSE SHOWER SPAS, INC., et al., Re: Docket No. 10 10 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 On October 19, 2012, Plaintiff Strongco Trading Company, LTD filed a Motion to Dismiss 14 Defendants’ counterclaims. Dkt. No. 10. Although Defendants filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s 15 Motion, Plaintiff subsequently failed to file a reply brief pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7. Further, 16 upon review of Plaintiff’s Motion, the Court found it to be confusing and contradictory, and 17 informed Plaintiff that it was therefore inclined to deny it in its entirety. Dkt. No. 13. Accordingly, 18 the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why its Motion should not be denied as drafted. Id. 19 Having reviewed Plaintiff’s response (Dkt. No. 15), the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for 20 the reasons stated in Defendants’ opposition. No hearing is necessary. Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 26, 2012 _______________________________ Maria-Elena James Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?