Aksu v. County of Contra Costa et al

Filing 54

ORDER Re: 53 Stipulated Request to change time of briefing schedule for Defendant Tanabe's Motion for Protective Order. Replies due by 9/26/2014. Responses due by 9/19/2014. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/25/2014. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 KEITH R. SCHIRMER, Esq. (087691) JULIA LEVITSKAIA, Esq. (286042) EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP 2300 Contra Costa Boulevard, Suite 450 Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3936 Telephone: (925) 827-3300 Facsimile: (925) 827-3320 Attorneys for Defendant STEPHEN TANABE Brian Gearinger, Esq. R. Stephen M. Laroe, Esq. GEARINGER LAW GROUP 825 Van Ness Avenue, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94109-7847 Telephone: (415) 440-3102 Attorneys for Plaintiff Andrew C. Schwartz, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF CASPER, MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK 2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 1020 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-7333 Telephone: 925-947-1147 Attorneys for Plaintiff 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, ) SUZANNE PORTER, TERRENCE ) THOMPSON, CHRISTOPHER BUTLER, ) BENNY CHETCUTI, JR., STEPHEN TANABE, SHERIFF DAVID LIVINGSTON ) ) and DOES ONE to FIFTY, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) HASAN ARDA AKSU, CASE NO.: C12-4268 CRB Order STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT TANABE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Date: October 10, 2014 Time: 10:00 a.m. Location: Courtroom 6 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer 25 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties, plaintiff HASAN ARDA AKSU, and 26 defendant STEPHEN TANABE, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that 27 plaintiff’s time to file their opposition to defendant’s Motion for Protective Order Restricting 28 1 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT TANABE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 Disclosure of Confidential, Private and Sensitive Information (re-filed on August 19, 2014) 2 currently due September 2, 2014, is hereby extended to September 19, 2014; and, defendant’s 3 reply to plaintiff’s opposition is likewise extended to be due September 26, 2014, for the 4 following reason: parties are presently engaged in efforts to resolve their discovery dispute by 5 stipulation. Granting an extension of time for the parties to file their responsive briefs will 6 provide the parties additional time to review the records in dispute and determine whether a 7 stipulation regarding the records’ confidentiality may be reached, if at all. 8 extension of time will not alter this court’s hearing date on defendant’s Motion for Protective 9 Order Restricting Disclosure of Confidential, Private and Sensitive Information if no stipulation 10 11 12 The proposed is reached. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: August 22, 2014 EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP 13 /s/ Keith R. Schirmer 14 15 16 17 DATED: August 22, 2014 GEARINGER LAW GROUP 18 /s/ Brian Gearinger 19 20 21 DATED: August 22, 2014 LAW OFFICES OF CASPER, MEADOWS, SCHWARTZ & COOK 22 /s/ Andrew C. Schwartz 23 24 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. August 25, 2014 Date: _________________________ ___________________________________ JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT 28 2 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT TANABE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?