Aksu v. County of Contra Costa et al
Filing
54
ORDER Re: 53 Stipulated Request to change time of briefing schedule for Defendant Tanabe's Motion for Protective Order. Replies due by 9/26/2014. Responses due by 9/19/2014. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/25/2014. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
KEITH R. SCHIRMER, Esq. (087691)
JULIA LEVITSKAIA, Esq. (286042)
EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP
2300 Contra Costa Boulevard, Suite 450
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523-3936
Telephone: (925) 827-3300
Facsimile: (925) 827-3320
Attorneys for Defendant STEPHEN TANABE
Brian Gearinger, Esq.
R. Stephen M. Laroe, Esq.
GEARINGER LAW GROUP
825 Van Ness Avenue, 4th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94109-7847
Telephone: (415) 440-3102
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Andrew C. Schwartz, Esq.
LAW OFFICES OF CASPER, MEADOWS,
SCHWARTZ & COOK
2121 N. California Blvd., Suite 1020
Walnut Creek, CA 94596-7333
Telephone: 925-947-1147
Attorneys for Plaintiff
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,
)
SUZANNE PORTER, TERRENCE
)
THOMPSON, CHRISTOPHER BUTLER,
)
BENNY CHETCUTI, JR., STEPHEN
TANABE, SHERIFF DAVID LIVINGSTON )
)
and DOES ONE to FIFTY, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
HASAN ARDA AKSU,
CASE NO.: C12-4268 CRB
Order
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME OF BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT
TANABE’S MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Date:
October 10, 2014
Time:
10:00 a.m.
Location: Courtroom 6
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA
Judge:
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
25
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties, plaintiff HASAN ARDA AKSU, and
26
defendant STEPHEN TANABE, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that
27
plaintiff’s time to file their opposition to defendant’s Motion for Protective Order Restricting
28
1
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANT TANABE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
1
Disclosure of Confidential, Private and Sensitive Information (re-filed on August 19, 2014)
2
currently due September 2, 2014, is hereby extended to September 19, 2014; and, defendant’s
3
reply to plaintiff’s opposition is likewise extended to be due September 26, 2014, for the
4
following reason: parties are presently engaged in efforts to resolve their discovery dispute by
5
stipulation. Granting an extension of time for the parties to file their responsive briefs will
6
provide the parties additional time to review the records in dispute and determine whether a
7
stipulation regarding the records’ confidentiality may be reached, if at all.
8
extension of time will not alter this court’s hearing date on defendant’s Motion for Protective
9
Order Restricting Disclosure of Confidential, Private and Sensitive Information if no stipulation
10
11
12
The proposed
is reached.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: August 22, 2014
EDRINGTON, SCHIRMER & MURPHY LLP
13
/s/
Keith R. Schirmer
14
15
16
17
DATED: August 22, 2014
GEARINGER LAW GROUP
18
/s/
Brian Gearinger
19
20
21
DATED: August 22, 2014
LAW OFFICES OF CASPER, MEADOWS,
SCHWARTZ & COOK
22
/s/
Andrew C. Schwartz
23
24
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
August 25, 2014
Date: _________________________
___________________________________
JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT
28
2
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME OF BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFENDANT TANABE’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?