McGee v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 36

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 7/31/2013. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 28, 2013. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAHN MCGEE, et al., 7 Case No. 12-cv-04286-JST Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., 10 Re: ECF No. 34 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 On May 20, 2013, the Court dismissed the only claim in the first amended complaint that 14 15 Plaintiffs asserted against two named defendants, and it granted Plaintiffs leave to file an amended 16 complaint by June 9, 2013. ECF No. 34. As of the date of this order, Plaintiffs have not filed an 17 amended complaint. The remaining claims in the first amended complaint are asserted against 18 unnamed “Doe” defendants. Though more than 120 days have passed since Plaintiffs filed the 19 first amended complaint, Plaintiffs have not yet served the “Doe” defendants.1 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 4(m) (permitting a district court to dismiss a claim if the plaintiff does not serve the defendant 21 within 120 days of the date on which the complaint is filed); see also Hason v. Med. Bd. of Cal., 22 279 F.3d 1167, 1174 (9th Cir. 2002) (affirming dismissal for failure to prosecute on the ground 23 that the plaintiff failed to serve the defendants within 120 days of filing the complaint). By July 31, 2013, Plaintiffs shall show cause, in writing, why this action should not be 24 25 dismissed for failure to prosecute. Alternatively, by July 31, 2013, Plaintiffs may file an amended 26 complaint that cures the deficiencies identified in the order dismissing the claims against the 27 28 1 Plaintiffs filed the first amended complaint on January 7, 2013. ECF No. 15. 1 named defendants and file a certificate of service with respect to the “Doe” defendants. A failure 2 to file either a statement in response to this order or an amended complaint and certificate of 3 service will result in the dismissal of this action. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 28, 2013 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?