McGee v. County of Alameda et al

Filing 79

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 77 STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER; Stipulation Re Motion to Compel Deadline; [Proposed] Order filed by Travis Higgins, Miguel Ibarra, Thomas Nelson, Andrea Nederostek, John Townsley, County of Alameda, Lonala Kaho'Ali'l, Alberto-Andres Holmes, Derek Meza, Christopher Haendel, Gregory J. Ahern, Ryan Swetavage. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 11, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

John L. Burris, State Bar No. 069888
Benjamin Nisenbaum, State Bar No. 222173
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120
Oakland, CA 94621
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Thomas F. Bertrand, State Bar No. 056560
Richard W. Osman, State Bar No. 167993
Michael C. Wenzel, State Bar No. 215388
BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL
2749 Hyde Street
San Francisco, California 94109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
18

JOE PERVOE, individually and as successor in
interest to John Wayne McGee, and CAROLYN
COPELAND, individually,

CASE NO.: 4:12-cv-04286 JST

19

STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO
COMPEL DEADLINE; [PROPOSED]
ORDER

Plaintiff,
20

v.

21

RYAN SWETAVAGE, an individual; MIGUEL
IBARRA, an individual; LONALA
KAHO’ALI’I, an individual; ANDREA
NEDEROSTEK, an individual; TRAVIS
HIGGINS, an individual; DEREK MEZA, an
individual; CHRISTOPHER HAENDEL, an
individual; ALBERTO-ANDRES HOLMES, an
individual; JOHN TOWNSLEY, an individual;
THOMAS NELSON, an individual; and DOES
1-50, inclusive, in their capacities as Sheriff’s
Deputies for the COUNTY OF ALAMEDA,

22
23
24
25
26
27

Defendants.
28

1
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL DEADLINE
Pervoe, et al. v. Swetavage, et al.; USDC Case No. 4:12-cv-04286 JST

1

STIPULATION

2

WHEREAS, the parties have proceeded with conducting discovery in the instant action;

3

WHEREAS, the parties previously submitted to the Court a Stipulation Regarding ADR,

4

Expert Witness Designations, and Fact Discovery on February 2, 2015, to extend the completion of

5

fact discovery;

6

WHEREAS, the Court ordered the close of fact discovery extended to March 5, 2015, such

7

that Plaintiffs’ should respond to Defendants’ contention interrogatories by the close of fact

8

discovery;

9

WHEREAS, the parties have met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs’ discovery responses

10

and Plaintiffs’ agreed to supplement their responses, including contention interrogatories

11

responses;

12
13

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ failed to provide supplemental responses to Defendants’ contention
interrogatories and other fact discovery by March 5, 2015;

14
15

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 37-3 Defendants’ deadline to file a motion to compel
further responses to their discovery requests is March 12, 2015;

16
17

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel has assured Defendants’ counsel that Plaintiffs’
supplemental discovery responses will be served on March 11, 2015;

18

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court’s scheduling order in this

19

action be modified to allow the Plaintiffs’ time to serve supplemental discovery responses and so

20

that Defendants may have sufficient time to review the responses prior to expiration of the motion

21

to compel deadline, by:

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

2
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL DEADLINE
Pervoe, et al. v. Swetavage, et al.; USDC Case No. 4:12-cv-04286 JST

1

1.

Extending the motion to compel deadline to April 2, 2015, such that Plaintiffs can

2

meaningfully respond to Defendants’ contention interrogatories and other fact discovery by March

3

13, 2015.

4
5

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: March 11, 2015

6

THE LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS
/s/ Benjamin Nisenbaum
Benjamin Nisenbaum
Attorney for Plaintiff

7
8

Dated: March 11, 2015

BERTRAND, FOX, ELLIOT, OSMAN & WENZEL

9

/s/ Michael Wenzel
Michael Wenzel
Attorney for Defendants

10
11
12

[PROPOSED] ORDER
13
14

GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Court hereby orders as follows:

15

1.

The motion to compel deadline is hereby extended to April 2, 2015, such that

16

Plaintiffs shall respond to Defendants’ contention interrogatories and other discovery by March 13,

17

2015.

RT

23

nS
J u d ge J o

ER

. Ti ga r

25

A

H

24

R NIA

NO

22

FO

21

DERED

O OR
________________________________
IT IS S
Hon. Jon S. Tigar
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

LI

20

March 11, 2015
Dated:______________

UNIT
ED

19

S

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT
U
O

18

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

26
27
28

3
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION TO COMPEL DEADLINE
Pervoe, et al. v. Swetavage, et al.; USDC Case No. 4:12-cv-04286 JST

C