EPL Holdings, LLC v. Apple, Inc
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC FROM 11/30/12 TO 12/21/12 AT 9:00 A.M. Case Management Conference set for 12/21/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/29/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
ARTHUR S. BEEMAN (State Bar No. 237996)
arthur.beeman@snrdenton.com
PAMELA K. FULMER (State Bar No. 154736)
pam.fulmer@snrdenton.com
IMRAN A. KHALIQ (State Bar No. 232607)
SNR DENTON US, LLP
1530 Page Mill Road, Suite 200
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125
Telephone: (650) 798-0300
Facsimile: (650) 798-0310
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EPL Holdings, LLC
7
8
9
10
11
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
Michael D. Jay (SBN: 223827)
mjay@bsfllp.com
225 Santa Monica Blvd., 11th Floor
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Telephone: (310) 395-5884
Facsimile: (310) 578-7898
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
APPLE, INC.
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
EPL HOLDINGS LLC,
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE, INC.,
20
Defendant.
Case No. 3:12-cv-04306 (EMC)
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER PURSUANT TO CIV. LOCAL
RULE 6-2 TO CHANGE THE CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
DATE DUE TO COUNSEL'S FAMILY
MEDICAL EMERGENCY
21
22
APPLE, INC.
23
24
25
Counterclaimant,
v.
EPL HOLDINGS LLC,
26
Counterclaim Defendant.
27
28
Case No. 3:12-cv-04306 (EMC)
27399741\V-1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
1
2
3
4
Whereas, the Case Management Conference ("CMC") is currently scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on
Friday, November 30, 2012 before this Court;
Whereas, Plaintiff EPL's lead counsel, Arthur Beeman, has a medical family emergency to
attend to on Friday November 30, 2012;
5
Whereas, counsel for Plaintiff contacted the Court to determine if the Court has an alternative
6
date available to hold the CMC, and the Court's clerk informed counsel that December 21, 2012 or
7
January 3, 2013 were the next available dates available on the Court's calendar to hold the CMC;
8
9
Whereas, in view of Mr. Beeman's family medical situation, Plaintiff and Defendant have met
and conferred and agreed to request a postponement of the upcoming CMC to December 21, 2012;
10
Therefore, pursuant to Civ. Local Rule 6-2 and the Court's inherent authority, Plaintiff and
11
Defendant hereby stipulate and agree to request a postponement of the CMC scheduled for November
12
30, 2012 to December 21, 2012.
13
The previous time modifications in this case are follows:
•
14
On September 5, 2012, the parties stipulated for an extension for defendant to respond
to the Complaint. (Dkt No. 12)
15
•
16
On October 15, 2012, the parties stipulated to request a continuance of the CMC,
17
which the Court originally set for November 16, 2012 and then reset to November 30,
18
2012. (Dkt. Nos. 25-27).
19
20
The requested change of time to the CMC will not affect any other date currently scheduled in
this case.
21
22
23
Dated: 11/28/12
24
SNR DENTON USA, LLP
By:
25
/s/ Arthur S. Beeman
Arthur S. Beeman
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant
EPL HOLDINGS, LLC
26
27
28
2
Case No. 3:12-cv-04306 (EMC)
27399741\V-1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
1
Dated: 11/28/12
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
2
By:
3
4
/s/ Michael D. Jay
Michael D. Jay
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
APPLE, INC.
5
6
7
8
Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been
9
obtained by all signatories.
10
11
12
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
The CMC currently scheduled for 11/30/12 is reset to 9:00 a.m. on December 21, 2012.
13
S
17
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
R NIA
UNIT
ED
16
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
_______________________________________
THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN
hen
UNITED STATES ard M. C JUDGE
DISTRICT
dge Edw
Ju
18
RT
ER
H
20
FO
NO
19
LI
15
11/29/12
Dated: ____________
21
A
14
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 3:12-cv-04306 (EMC)
27399741\V-1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?