EPL Holdings, LLC v. Apple, Inc

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING CMC FROM 11/30/12 TO 12/21/12 AT 9:00 A.M. Case Management Conference set for 12/21/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/29/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 ARTHUR S. BEEMAN (State Bar No. 237996) arthur.beeman@snrdenton.com PAMELA K. FULMER (State Bar No. 154736) pam.fulmer@snrdenton.com IMRAN A. KHALIQ (State Bar No. 232607) SNR DENTON US, LLP 1530 Page Mill Road, Suite 200 Palo Alto, CA 94304-1125 Telephone: (650) 798-0300 Facsimile: (650) 798-0310 Attorneys for Plaintiff EPL Holdings, LLC 7 8 9 10 11 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Michael D. Jay (SBN: 223827) mjay@bsfllp.com 225 Santa Monica Blvd., 11th Floor Santa Monica, CA 90401 Telephone: (310) 395-5884 Facsimile: (310) 578-7898 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant APPLE, INC. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 EPL HOLDINGS LLC, 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. APPLE, INC., 20 Defendant. Case No. 3:12-cv-04306 (EMC) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER PURSUANT TO CIV. LOCAL RULE 6-2 TO CHANGE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE DATE DUE TO COUNSEL'S FAMILY MEDICAL EMERGENCY 21 22 APPLE, INC. 23 24 25 Counterclaimant, v. EPL HOLDINGS LLC, 26 Counterclaim Defendant. 27 28 Case No. 3:12-cv-04306 (EMC) 27399741\V-1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 2 3 4 Whereas, the Case Management Conference ("CMC") is currently scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on Friday, November 30, 2012 before this Court; Whereas, Plaintiff EPL's lead counsel, Arthur Beeman, has a medical family emergency to attend to on Friday November 30, 2012; 5 Whereas, counsel for Plaintiff contacted the Court to determine if the Court has an alternative 6 date available to hold the CMC, and the Court's clerk informed counsel that December 21, 2012 or 7 January 3, 2013 were the next available dates available on the Court's calendar to hold the CMC; 8 9 Whereas, in view of Mr. Beeman's family medical situation, Plaintiff and Defendant have met and conferred and agreed to request a postponement of the upcoming CMC to December 21, 2012; 10 Therefore, pursuant to Civ. Local Rule 6-2 and the Court's inherent authority, Plaintiff and 11 Defendant hereby stipulate and agree to request a postponement of the CMC scheduled for November 12 30, 2012 to December 21, 2012. 13 The previous time modifications in this case are follows: • 14 On September 5, 2012, the parties stipulated for an extension for defendant to respond to the Complaint. (Dkt No. 12) 15 • 16 On October 15, 2012, the parties stipulated to request a continuance of the CMC, 17 which the Court originally set for November 16, 2012 and then reset to November 30, 18 2012. (Dkt. Nos. 25-27). 19 20 The requested change of time to the CMC will not affect any other date currently scheduled in this case. 21 22 23 Dated: 11/28/12 24 SNR DENTON USA, LLP By: 25 /s/ Arthur S. Beeman Arthur S. Beeman Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant EPL HOLDINGS, LLC 26 27 28 2 Case No. 3:12-cv-04306 (EMC) 27399741\V-1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 Dated: 11/28/12 BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP 2 By: 3 4 /s/ Michael D. Jay Michael D. Jay Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant APPLE, INC. 5 6 7 8 Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i), the filer attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been 9 obtained by all signatories. 10 11 12 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: The CMC currently scheduled for 11/30/12 is reset to 9:00 a.m. on December 21, 2012. 13 S 17 DERED O OR IT IS S R NIA UNIT ED 16 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O _______________________________________ THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN hen UNITED STATES ard M. C JUDGE DISTRICT dge Edw Ju 18 RT ER H 20 FO NO 19 LI 15 11/29/12 Dated: ____________ 21 A 14 N F D IS T IC T O R C 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 3:12-cv-04306 (EMC) 27399741\V-1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?