Maharaj v. Bank of America N.A.

Filing 12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 9/17/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C 12-4317 SI

PURNIMA MAHARAJ,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Plaintiff,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Defendant.

/

13
On August 23, 2012, defendant Bank of America filed a motion to dismiss and noticed the
14
motion for a hearing on October 5, 2012. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion was due on September
15
6, 2012. Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, did not file an opposition, nor did plaintiff request an
16
extension of time.
17
Accordingly, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing no later than September 26,
18
2012, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ.
19
Proc. 41(b). If plaintiff responds to this Order and wishes to proceed with this lawsuit, the Court will
20
set a new briefing schedule and hearing date on defendant’s motion to dismiss. The October 5, 2012
21
hearing date is VACATED.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24
Dated: September 17, 2012
25
26
27
28

SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge