Blackwell v. Robinson et al

Filing 39

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND SETTING DEADLINES FOR REPLY BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/7/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

STEVEN BLACKWELL,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 12-04329 JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME AND
SETTING DEADLINES FOR
REPLY BRIEFS

v.
STEVE ROBINSON, et al.,
Defendants.

(Docket No. 34)
/

14
15

On January 3, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file opposition

16

briefs to the various motions filed by the Defendants in this case, all of which are scheduled for

17

hearing on March 29, 2013.

18

On January 3, 2013, Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss and to compel

19

arbitration (Docket No. 27), filed by Defendants Deborah Leever, Mission Financial Services

20

Corporation, William N. Elder, Foell & Elder, and Wessels Enterprises, Inc., dba A-1 Recovery.

21

(See Docket No. 35.)

22

On January 4, 2013, Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss filed by Bank

23

of the West (Docket No. 26). (See Docket No. 37.) On that same date, Plaintiff filed an

24

opposition brief to the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim and motion to dismiss for

25

improper venue filed by Defendants Steven Robinson and the Madera County Sheriff’s

26

Department (Docket Nos. 28, 29). (See Docket No. 38.)

27
28

In light of the number of motions, the fact that Plaintiff filed his opposition briefs within
a short time after they were originally due, and the fact that the hearing is not scheduled until

1

March 29, 2013, the Court grants Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time, and deems Docket

2

Nos. 36-38 timely filed. The Defendants shall file their reply briefs by January 14, 2013.

3
4
5
6

If the court finds the motions suitable for disposition without oral argument, it shall
notify the parties in advance of the hearing date.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 7, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5
STEVEN BLACKWELL,

Case Number: CV12-04329 JSW

6
Plaintiff,

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

7
v.
8
STEVE ROBINSON et al,
9
Defendant.
11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

/

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on January 7, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by
placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter
listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an
inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.

15
16
17

Steven Diez Blackwell
P.O. Box 3-81 Shulin City, Taipei County 238
Shulin city, 10487,

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: January 7, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk