Crump

Filing 64

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 62 Regarding Defendant M. Gordon's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Steve Crump, Motions terminated: 56 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by M. Gordon, 62 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Defendant M. Gordon's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by Steve Crump.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/7/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DAVID B. BAYLESS (Bar No. 189235) E-mail: dbayless@cov.com CLARA J. SHIN (Bar No. 214809) E-mail: cshin@cov.com REBECCA A. JACOBS (Bar No. 294430) E-mail: rjacobs@cov.com COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street, 35th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-5356 Telephone: (415) 591-6000 Facsimile: (415) 591-6091 Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE CRUMP 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DONNA R. ZIEGLER (Bar No. 142415) County Counsel JILL SAZAMA (Bar No. 214215) Deputy County Counsel E-mail: jill.sazama@acgov.org Office of the County Counsel 1221 Oak Street, Suite 450 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 272-6700 Facsimile: (510) 272-5020 Attorneys for Defendant DEPUTY M. GORDON 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 STEVE CRUMP, 19 20 Plaintiff, v. 21 WARDEN GREGORY AHERN et al, Civil Case No. C12-04357 EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT M. GORDON’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 22 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEF. GORDON’S MTD FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT C12-04357 EMC 1 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the 2 parties hereto through their respective attorneys of record, that subject to the Court’s approval, 3 Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses the Second Cause of Action of the First Amended Complaint 4 (Dkt. No. 53); Defendant M. Gordon withdraws his Motion to Dismiss the First Amended 5 Complaint (Dkt. No. 56), which relates to the Second Cause of Action; and the parties will 6 proceed with the balance of the First Amended Complaint intact. This Stipulation is based on 7 the following: 8 9 10 1. On September 30, 2014, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 53) with two causes of action. 2. On October 14, 2014, Defendant M. Gordon filed a Motion to Dismiss the First 11 Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 56) (the “Motion”), relating solely to the Second Cause of 12 Action of the First Amended Complaint. 13 3. Plaintiff does not oppose the Motion, and instead hereby voluntarily dismisses 14 the Second Cause of Action, rendering the Motion moot. In response, Defendant M. Gordon 15 hereby withdraws the Motion. 16 4. The parties will proceed with the balance of the First Amended Complaint intact. 17 5. The parties respectfully request that the Court enter an Order approving this 18 Stipulation. In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer of this document attests that 19 the concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory hereto. Respectfully submitted, 20 21 23 DAVID B. BAYLESS CLARA J. SHIN REBECCA A. JACOBS COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 24 By: 22 DATED: November 5, 2014 25 /s/ Rebecca A. Jacobs Rebecca A. Jacobs Attorneys for Plaintiff STEVE CRUMP 26 27 28 1 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEF. GORDON’S MTD FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT C12-04357 EMC 1 2 3 4 DATED: November 5, 2014 DONNA R. ZEIGLER, County Counsel in and for the County of Alameda, State of California JILL SAZAMA Deputy County Counsel By: 5 6 /s/ Jill Sazama Jill Sazama Attorneys for Defendant DEPUTY M. GORDON 7 8 7th Nov. SIGNED on the _____ day of ____________, 2014. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 13 Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Californian Che ard M. dge Edw Ju 14 H ER LI RT 16 17 FO NO 15 R NIA DERED SO OR IT IS THE HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN 12 A 11 Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. S 10 [PROPOSED] ORDER UNIT ED 9 N F D IS T IC T O R C 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DEF. GORDON’S MTD FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT C12-04357 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?