Crump
Filing
76
Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding. Case Settled. Telephonic status conference set for 1/13/15 at 1:00 pm. Signed by Judge Nandor J. Vadas on 12/5/14. (glm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
STEVE CRUMP,
Case No. 12-cv-04357-EMC (NJV)
Plaintiff,
8
v.
REPORT OF PRO SE PRISONER
EARLY SETTLEMENT PROCEEDING
9
10
M. GORDON,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
A settlement conference was held on December 5, 2015, and the results of that proceeding
are indicated below:
(1) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives participated in the
16
proceeding, and each possessed the requisite settlement authority:
17
( X ) Plaintiff
18
( ) Warden or warden’s representative
19
( ) Office of the California Attorney General
20
( X ) Other: Jill Sazama, Alameda County Counsel
21
(2) The following individuals, parties, and/or representatives did not appear:
22
_____________________________________________________________________
23
(3) The outcome of the proceeding was:
24
( X ) The case has been completely settled. A telephonic status conference will take
25
place January 13, 2015 at 1:00 pm. Defense counsel will arrange for Plaintiff's telephonic
26
appearance. The parties shall dial 888-684-8852 and enter access code 1868782 to make their
27
appearances.
28
( ) The case has been partially resolved and counsel for defendants shall file a joint
1
stipulation regarding those claims which have been resolved. The issues outlined on the sheet
2
attached remain for this Court to resolve.
3
4
5
6
7
( ) The parties are unable to reach an agreement at this time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 12/9/14
______________________________________
NANDOR J. VADAS
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?