Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Santana et al

Filing 19

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/22/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 Joe Hand Promotions, Inc., 6 7 8 Plaintiff, ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS v. Santana, 9 Defendant. 10 / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court No. CV12-04361 JSW 12 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case 13 Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further 14 ORDERED that: 15 A. DATES 16 Jury Trial Date: 10/28/2013, at 8:00 a.m., 17 Jury Selection: 10/23/2013, at 8:00 a.m., 18 Pretrial Conference: Monday, 10/7/2013, at 2:00 p.m. 19 Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 7/26/2013, 9:00 a.m. 20 Last Day for ALL Discovery: 6/1/2013 21 B. DISCOVERY 22 The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses 24 pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of 25 non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all 26 supplementation has been completed. 27 28 1 C. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 2 The parties shall file a Notice of Need for an ADR Telephone Conference by 3 January 28, 2013. 4 D. 5 No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its 6 own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) 7 without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline 8 contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties 9 may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule 12 that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are 13 specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain 14 leave of Court. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 Dated: January 22, 2013 17 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?