Cobb v. Under Seal

Filing 7

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO FILE CASE UNDER SEAL; DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF. Plaintiff is directed to pay to the Clerk of the Court, no later than November 9, 2012, the filing fee of $350, or, in the alternative, to file by said date an amended application to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 22, 2012. (mmclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 CHRISTOPHER ALAN COBB, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 No. C-12-4390 MMC ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST TO FILE CASE UNDER SEAL; DENYING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; DIRECTIONS TO CLERK; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF v. UNDER SEAL, Defendant 15 / 16 17 Before the Court is plaintiff Christopher Alan Cobb’s complaint, filed August 20, 18 2012, and plaintiff’s Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, filed August 21, 2012. 19 Having read and considered plaintiff’s filings, the Court rules as follows: 20 1. When plaintiff submitted his complaint to the Clerk of the Court, plaintiff orally 21 requested that the case be filed under seal, and the Clerk, in an abundance of caution, 22 temporarily sealed the case pending review by the assigned judge.1 Because plaintiff has 23 failed to make any showing as to the need to file the complaint or any other document 24 under seal, plaintiff’s request to seal the case is hereby DENIED. See Civil L. R. 79-5 25 (setting forth limited circumstances when documents may be filed under seal). 26 Accordingly, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to unseal the case. 27 2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is deficient, for the reason 28 1 The instant action was reassigned to the undersigned on October 15, 2012 1 plaintiff failed to sign the application. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a) (providing “[e]very pleading, 2 written motion, and other paper must be signed . . . by a party personally if the party is 3 unrepresented”); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (providing party seeking to proceed in forma pauperis 4 must submit affidavit in support of request). Moreover, plaintiff’s application appears 5 facially implausible, because plaintiff asserts therein he is not employed, has no income 6 from any source, does not have a bank account, does not own any cash or any other asset, 7 has no monthly expenses, and has no credit or debts. 8 Accordingly, plaintiff’s application is hereby DENIED, and plaintiff is hereby 9 DIRECTED to pay to the Clerk of the Court, no later than November 9, 2012, the filing fee 10 of $350, or, in the alternative, to file by said date an amended application to proceed in 11 forma pauperis. Should plaintiff elect to file an amended application, plaintiff must sign the 12 application and must provide a more detailed and complete description of his economic 13 circumstances. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 Dated: October 22, 2012 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?