Seime v. Haley et al

Filing 54

ORDER SETTING HEARING DATE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE re 52 Order, Set Deadlines/Hearings,, 53 Clerks Notice, 49 MOTION to Dismiss The Amended Complaint and in The Alternative to Stay Litigation Pending Arbitration MOTION to Stay re 16 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint and in the Alternative to Stay Litigation Pending Arbitration filed by Pillar Panama, S.A., Scott Harris, Christopher Hahn, Joe Haley (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
KAREN J. SEIME,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 12-04420 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

15

JOE HALEY, PILLAR PANAMA, S.A.,
aka OCEANS INTERNATIONAL
GROUP, Panamanian corporation, SCOTT
HARRIS, and CHRISTOPHER HAHN,

16

ORDER SETTING HEARING
DATE AND CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Defendants.

14

/

17
18

Pursuant to stipulation of the parties, the hearing date on defendants’ motion to dismiss

19

was stayed to allow the parties to mediate the dispute. The stipulation was granted in part due to

20

the fact that plaintiff Karen Seime, initially proceeding pro se, had retained new counsel. The

21

parties further agreed that the motion to dismiss “shall be deemed to apply to the First Amended

22

Complaint and shall be heard on the basis of the submissions that have already been filed with

23

the Court in support of and opposition to the pending Dismissal Motion (with no further

24

submissions to be filed).” The order granting the continuance stated that “by March 1, 2013, the

25

parties shall file a joint statement notifying the Court as to whether or not the case has settled

26

and proposing a date at least 30 days out for the motion hearing” (Dkt. No. 47).

27
28

The parties have now filed a joint report regarding the status of mediation stating that
mediation is not even scheduled until April 22 and requesting a further continuance to May 13

1

for a further status update (Dkt. No. 51). In order to move this action along, and given that

2

defendants’ motion has been pending for several months, the following schedule is hereby set:

3

A hearing on defendants’ motion to dismiss is hereby set for APRIL 11, 2013. The parties

4

are on notice that, because the motion is fully briefed, the Court may issue an order at any time

5

prior to the hearing date.

6
7

The case management conference previously set for March 14 is hereby set for APRIL 11,
2013. The parties must file a joint case management statement by APRIL 8.

8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

Dated: March 5, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2