Sewing v. Stryker Corporation et al

Filing 68

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY BRADLEY REEVES by Hon. William Alsup denying 63 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 CONSTANCE SEWING, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY BRADLEY REEVES STRYKER CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. / 15 16 No. C 12-04455 WHA The pro hac vice application of Attorney Bradley Reeves (Dkt. No. 63) is DENIED for 17 failing to specify membership in good standing of a United States Court or the highest court of 18 another State or the District of Columbia. Merely claiming membership of “the bar of the State 19 of Texas” is insufficient under the civil local rules. While the application fee does not need to be 20 paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted. 21 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: January 14, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?