Sewing v. Stryker Corporation et al

Filing 68

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY BRADLEY REEVES by Hon. William Alsup denying 63 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
CONSTANCE SEWING,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC
VICE APPLICATION OF
ATTORNEY BRADLEY REEVES

STRYKER CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
/

15
16

No. C 12-04455 WHA

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Bradley Reeves (Dkt. No. 63) is DENIED for

17

failing to specify membership in good standing of a United States Court or the highest court of

18

another State or the District of Columbia. Merely claiming membership of “the bar of the State

19

of Texas” is insufficient under the civil local rules. While the application fee does not need to be

20

paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: January 14, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE