APL CO. Pte., LTD., v. Export International Inc.
Filing
15
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 10 To Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint filed by American President Lines, Ltd., APL CO. Pte., LTD.,. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/18/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/18/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
LUCAS VALLEY LAW
MARK K. de LANGIS (SBN 190083)
2110 Elderberry Lane
San Rafael, California 94903
Telephone: (415) 472-3892
Facsimile: (415) 472-3977
mdelangis@lucasvalleylaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. and
APL CO. Pte., LTD.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
APL CO. Pte., LTD, a corporation, and
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD., a
corporation,
13
Plaintiffs,
No. C 12-4459 EMC
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND
THE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT
v.
14
15
16
EXPORT INTERNATIONAL, INC., a
corporation,
Defendant.
17
18
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, plaintiffs American President Lines, Ltd. and APL Co.
19
Pte., Ltd. (collectively “APL”) and defendant Export International, Inc. (“EI”) request an order
20
extending the time for EI to file an appearance in this matter.
21
No previous time modification regarding EI’s appearance deadline have been requested
22
or granted. However, the parties have concurrently filed a Stipulated Request for Order Granting
23
Relief from Case Management Schedule.
24
The requested enlargement of time relating to EI’s appearance deadline is sought because
25
APL and EI seek to explore all avenues of an early disposition of this dispute and are in the
26
process of exchanging documents and information to that end. The parties believe it would be
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
1
beneficial to allow them to seek a possible resolution of the matter, and thereby request that the
2
Court extend EI’s appearance deadline to January 18, 2013. (See Declaration of Mark K. de
3
Langis, filed in support of this Stipulated Request.)
4
5
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff APL and defendant EI that EI’s
appearance deadline be extended to January 18, 2013.
6
7
DATED: December 14, 2012
LUCAS VALLEY LAW
8
9
By: /s/ Mark K. de Langis
Mark K. de Langis
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD.
APL Co. Pte., Ltd.
10
11
12
13
14
DATED: December 14, 2012
HELTZEL, WILLIAMS, YANDELL, ROTH,
SMITH, PETERSEN & LUSH, P.C.
15
16
17
By:__/s/__Michael C. Petersen_________________
Michael C. Petersen
Attorneys for Defendant
EXPORT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
18
19
20
21
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
22
S
R NIA
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
. Chen
NO
dward M
H
ER
FO
RT
Judge E
2
LI
26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
A
25
S DISTRICT
TE
C
______________________________________________
TA
RT
U
O
24
12/18/12
Dated: ______________
UNIT
ED
23
N
F
C
1
2
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 5.1
I, Mark K. de Langis, hereby attest that I have on file all holographic signatures
3
corresponding to any signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed
4
document
5
6
7
8
By: /s/
Mark K. de Langis
Mark K. de Langis
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?