APL CO. Pte., LTD., v. Export International Inc.

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 16 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (SECOND) To Extend Time for Defendant to Appear filed by American President Lines, Ltd., APL CO. Pte., LTD.,. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/24/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 LUCAS VALLEY LAW MARK K. de LANGIS (SBN 190083) 2110 Elderberry Lane San Rafael, California 94903 Telephone: (415) 472-3892 Facsimile: (415) 472-3977 mdelangis@lucasvalleylaw.com Attorney for Plaintiffs AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. and APL CO. Pte., LTD. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 APL CO. Pte., LTD, a corporation, and AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD., a corporation, 13 Plaintiffs, No. C 12-4459 EMC SECOND STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT v. 14 15 16 EXPORT INTERNATIONAL, INC., a corporation, Defendant. 17 18 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, plaintiffs American President Lines, Ltd. and APL Co. 19 Pte., Ltd. (collectively “APL”) and defendant Export International, Inc. (“EI”) request an order 20 extending the time for EI to file an appearance in this matter. 21 One previous time modification regarding EI’s appearance deadline has been requested 22 and granted. The parties have concurrently filed a Second Stipulated Request for Order Granting 23 Relief from Case Management Schedule. 24 This second request to extend EI’s appearance deadline is sought to allow APL and EI 25 time to finalize a settlement agreement. The parties have agreed on the amount of a settlement 26 payment from EI to APL. However, a term of the proposed settlement involves APL entering SECOND STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 1 into a shipping contract with EI. An enlargement of the time for the Case Management Schedule 2 will allow the parties to negotiate the terms of that contract and complete the settlement. (See 3 Declaration of Mark K. de Langis, filed in support of this Second Stipulated Motion.) 4 5 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff APL and defendant EI that EI’s appearance deadline be extended to February 1, 2013. 6 7 DATED: January 17, 2013 LUCAS VALLEY LAW 8 9 By: /s/ Mark K. de Langis Mark K. de Langis Attorneys for Plaintiffs AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. APL Co. Pte., Ltd. 10 11 12 13 14 DATED: January 17, 2013 HELTZEL, WILLIAMS, YANDELL, ROTH, SMITH, PETERSEN & LUSH, P.C. 15 16 17 By:__/s/_Michael C. Petersen___________________ Michael C. Petersen Attorneys for Defendant EXPORT INTERNATIONAL, INC. 18 19 20 21 PURSUANT TODISTRIC S STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED Chen RT FO ard M. dw Judge E R NIA DERE SO OR DISTRICT JUDGE IT IS UNITED STATES NO 26 ______________________________________________ D SECOND STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT H ER LI 25 TC A 24 1/24/13 Dated: ______________ UNIT ED 23 E AT T RT U O S 22 2 N F D IS T IC T O R C 1 2 3 ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 5.1 I, Mark K. de Langis, attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to any signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. 4 5 ____/s/__Mark K. de Langis______________ 6 Mark K. de Langis 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 SECOND STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?