APL CO. Pte., LTD., v. Export International Inc.
Filing
20
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 16 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (SECOND) To Extend Time for Defendant to Appear filed by American President Lines, Ltd., APL CO. Pte., LTD.,. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/24/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
LUCAS VALLEY LAW
MARK K. de LANGIS (SBN 190083)
2110 Elderberry Lane
San Rafael, California 94903
Telephone: (415) 472-3892
Facsimile: (415) 472-3977
mdelangis@lucasvalleylaw.com
Attorney for Plaintiffs
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD. and
APL CO. Pte., LTD.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
APL CO. Pte., LTD, a corporation, and
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD., a
corporation,
13
Plaintiffs,
No. C 12-4459 EMC
SECOND STIPULATED MOTION TO
EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND
TO THE COMPLAINT
v.
14
15
16
EXPORT INTERNATIONAL, INC., a
corporation,
Defendant.
17
18
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, plaintiffs American President Lines, Ltd. and APL Co.
19
Pte., Ltd. (collectively “APL”) and defendant Export International, Inc. (“EI”) request an order
20
extending the time for EI to file an appearance in this matter.
21
One previous time modification regarding EI’s appearance deadline has been requested
22
and granted. The parties have concurrently filed a Second Stipulated Request for Order Granting
23
Relief from Case Management Schedule.
24
This second request to extend EI’s appearance deadline is sought to allow APL and EI
25
time to finalize a settlement agreement. The parties have agreed on the amount of a settlement
26
payment from EI to APL. However, a term of the proposed settlement involves APL entering
SECOND STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
1
into a shipping contract with EI. An enlargement of the time for the Case Management Schedule
2
will allow the parties to negotiate the terms of that contract and complete the settlement. (See
3
Declaration of Mark K. de Langis, filed in support of this Second Stipulated Motion.)
4
5
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff APL and defendant EI that EI’s
appearance deadline be extended to February 1, 2013.
6
7
DATED: January 17, 2013
LUCAS VALLEY LAW
8
9
By: /s/ Mark K. de Langis
Mark K. de Langis
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LTD.
APL Co. Pte., Ltd.
10
11
12
13
14
DATED: January 17, 2013
HELTZEL, WILLIAMS, YANDELL, ROTH,
SMITH, PETERSEN & LUSH, P.C.
15
16
17
By:__/s/_Michael C. Petersen___________________
Michael C. Petersen
Attorneys for Defendant
EXPORT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
18
19
20
21
PURSUANT TODISTRIC
S STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
Chen
RT
FO
ard M.
dw
Judge E
R NIA
DERE
SO OR DISTRICT JUDGE
IT IS
UNITED STATES
NO
26
______________________________________________
D
SECOND STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
H
ER
LI
25
TC
A
24
1/24/13
Dated: ______________
UNIT
ED
23
E
AT
T
RT
U
O
S
22
2
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
1
2
3
ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL L.R. 5.1
I, Mark K. de Langis, attest that I have on file all holographic signatures corresponding to
any signatures indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
4
5
____/s/__Mark K. de Langis______________
6
Mark K. de Langis
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
SECOND STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?