Polo v. Shwiff et al

Filing 22

ORDER REQUIRING SUPPLEMENT TO CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT. SUPPLEMENT DUE 1/16/2013. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/14/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

PATRICK POLO,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

Plaintiff,

No. C 12-04461 JSW

v.

ORDER REQUIRING
SUPPLEMENT TO CASE
MANAGEMENT STATEMENT

ELIZABETH SHWIFF, et al.,

13

Defendants.
/

14
15

The Court has reviewed the parties’ Joint Case Management Statement. The Standing

16

Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California, Contents of Case Management

17

Statement, requires “[p]roposed dates for designation of experts, discovery cutoff, hearing of

18

dispositive motions, pretrial conference and trial.” (Standing Order, ¶ 17.) Although the parties

19

have provided competing dates for designation of experts and discovery cutoff, they state only

20

that dates for the hearing on dispositive motions, pretrial conference, and trial are “to be

21

discussed” at the case management conference. That statement does not comport with the

22

Standing Order. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

23

1.

The parties shall submit a supplement to their case management conference by

24

January 16, 2013, which sets forth specific proposed dates for the hearing on dispositive

25

motions, pretrial conference and trial.

26

2.

In light of the parties’ disagreement over the deadlines for designation of experts

27

and discovery cut-off, the Court expects that they will provide competing dates for the deadlines

28

discussed in paragraph 1 of this Order. Accordingly, the parties shall provide a short statement
justifying their respective positions.

1

3.

The parties are HEREBY ADVISED that pursuant to this Court’s standing

2

Orders, discovery motions are not permitted. Rather, the Court requires letter briefs. (See Civil

3

Standing Orders, ¶ 8.)

4
5
6

4.

The parties also HEREBY ADVISED that, in general, the Court will only

address one summary judgment per party or per side. (See Civil Standing Orders, ¶ 9.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated: January 14, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2