Santiago v. Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING 24 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 3/15/2013. Case Management Conference set for 3/22/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/3/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)
Case3:12-cv-04462-JSW Document24 Filed12/27/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
ERIC MECKLEY, SBN 168181
KATHRYN M. NAZARIAN, SBN 259392
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: 415.442.1000
Fax: 415.442.1001
emeckley@morganlewis.com
knazarian@morganlewis.com
Attorneys for Defendant
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER APPAREL, LLC
7
8
9
10
11
ERIC A. GROVER, SBN 136080
JADE BUTMAN, SBN 235920
KELLER GROVER LLP
1965 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
Tel: 415.543.1305
Fax: 415.543.7861
eagrover@kellergrover.com
jbutman@kellergrover.com
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT SANTIAGO
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
ROBERT SANTIAGO, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
and on behalf of the general public,
18
Plaintiffs,
Case No. CV 12-4462 JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
19
vs.
20
21
Complaint Filed:
July 20, 2012
ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER
APPAREL, LLC, and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPLUATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE CMC
(CASE NO. CV 12-4462 JSW)
DB1/ 72468448.1
Case3:12-cv-04462-JSW Document24 Filed12/27/12 Page2 of 3
1
Plaintiff Robert Santiago (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant ARAMARK Uniform & Career
2
Apparel, LLC (“Defendant” or “AUCA”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel,
3
hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
4
1. The initial Case Management Statement in this matter is currently scheduled for
5
January 4, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 11 before the Honorable Jeffrey S.
6
White.
7
2. On December 21, 2012, Defendant filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
8
and Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(c) and 12(h)(3). Defendant’s motion
9
is scheduled to be heard by the Court on February 8, 2013.
10
3. Given the pending motion, which seeks to dismiss the entire action, the Parties
11
believe that it would preserve, and make the most efficient use of, the Court’s and
12
the Parties’ time and resources to continue the case management conference to a
13
date following the Court’s ruling on Defendant’s motion. The contemplated
14
continuance would result in the initial case management conference being moved
15
out approximately seven (7) or so weeks.
16
4. Such a brief continuance will not adversely impact the management of this case or
17
result in undue prejudice or delay.
18
19
Dated: December 27, 2012
KELLER GROVER LLP
20
21
By:
22
23
_/S/ Jade Butman______________
Jade Butman
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT SANTIAGO
24
25
26
27
28
1
DB1/ 72468448.1
STIPLUATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE CMC
(CASE NO. CV 12-4462 JSW)
Case3:12-cv-04462-JSW Document24 Filed12/27/12 Page3 of 3
1
Dated: December 27, 2012
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
2
3
By:
4
5
____/S/ Eric Meckley____________
Eric Meckley
Attorneys for Defendant
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER
APPAREL, LLC
6
7
[PROPOSED] ORDER
8
The Parties’ requested continuance of the January 4, 2013 initial case management
9
conference is hereby GRANTED. The new date for the initial case management conference is
11
March 22
___________________________________, 2013. An updated joint case management
at 1:30 p.m.
conference statement must be filed seven days before the case management conference.
12
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
13
14
Dated: _______________________________
January 3, 2013
_______________________________
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
DB1/ 72468448.1
STIPLUATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE CMC
(CASE NO. CV 12-4462 JSW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?