Santiago v. Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC

Filing 28

ORDER GRANTING 26 STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/3/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)

Case3:12-cv-04462-JSW Document26 Filed01/02/13 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6

ERIC A. GROVER, SBN 136080
JADE BUTMAN, SBN 235920
KELLER GROVER LLP
1965 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT SANTIAGO

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

ERIC MECKLEY, SBN 168181
KATHRYN M. NAZARIAN, SBN 259392
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER
APPAREL, LLC

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17

ROBERT SANTIAGO, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
and on behalf of the general public,

18
Plaintiffs,

Case No. CV 12-4462 JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE

19
vs.
20
21

Complaint Filed:

July 20, 2012

ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER
APPAREL, LLC, and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,

22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPLUATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE
(CASE NO. CV 12-4462 JSW)
DB1/ 72653195.1

Case3:12-cv-04462-JSW Document26 Filed01/02/13 Page2 of 3

1

Plaintiff Robert Santiago (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant ARAMARK Uniform & Career

2

Apparel, LLC (“Defendant” or “AUCA”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel,

3

hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

4

1. On December 21, 2012, Defendant filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

5

and Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(c) and 12(h)(3). Defendant’s motion

6

is scheduled to be heard by the Court on February 8, 2013.

7

2. In light of holiday schedules and attorney absences, the parties have agreed to give

8

each side additional time to file their respective opposition and reply papers.

9

3. Accordingly, the parties have agreed to extend Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose the

10

motion from January 4, 2011, to January 11, 2013; and agreed to extend

11

Defendant’s deadline to reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion from January

12

11, 2013, to January 25, 2013.

13

4. Under the proposed schedule, the Court will have the fully briefed motion by

14

January 25, 2013, two weeks before the February 8, 2013 hearing date.

15
16

Dated: January 2, 2012

KELLER GROVER LLP

17
18

By:

19
20
21

Dated: January 2, 2012

/s/ Jade Butman_________________
Jade Butman
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT SANTIAGO

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

22
23

By:

24
25

/s/ Eric Meckley_________________
Eric Meckley
Attorneys for Defendant
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER
APPAREL, LLC

26
27
28
1

DB1/ 72653195.1

STIPLUATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE
(CASE NO. CV 12-4462 JSW)

Case3:12-cv-04462-JSW Document26 Filed01/02/13 Page3 of 3

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

The Parties’ requested modification of the briefing schedule is hereby GRANTED.

3

Plaintiff shall file his opposition on or before January 11, 2013. Defendant shall file its reply on

4

or before January 25, 2013.

5

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

January 3, 2013
Dated: _______________________________

_______________________________
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
DB1/ 72653195.1

STIPLUATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE
(CASE NO. CV 12-4462 JSW)