Santiago v. Aramark Uniform and Career Apparel, LLC
Filing
28
ORDER GRANTING 26 STIPULATION TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 1/3/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)
Case3:12-cv-04462-JSW Document26 Filed01/02/13 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
ERIC A. GROVER, SBN 136080
JADE BUTMAN, SBN 235920
KELLER GROVER LLP
1965 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94103
Tel: 415.543.1305
Fax: 415.543.7861
eagrover@kellergrover.com
jbutman@kellergrover.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT SANTIAGO
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
ERIC MECKLEY, SBN 168181
KATHRYN M. NAZARIAN, SBN 259392
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: 415.442.1000
Fax: 442-1001
emeckley@morganlewis.com
knazarian@morganlewis.com
Attorneys for Defendant
ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER
APPAREL, LLC
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
17
ROBERT SANTIAGO, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
and on behalf of the general public,
18
Plaintiffs,
Case No. CV 12-4462 JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
19
vs.
20
21
Complaint Filed:
July 20, 2012
ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER
APPAREL, LLC, and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
22
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPLUATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE
(CASE NO. CV 12-4462 JSW)
DB1/ 72653195.1
Case3:12-cv-04462-JSW Document26 Filed01/02/13 Page2 of 3
1
Plaintiff Robert Santiago (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant ARAMARK Uniform & Career
2
Apparel, LLC (“Defendant” or “AUCA”), by and through their respective undersigned counsel,
3
hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
4
1. On December 21, 2012, Defendant filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
5
and Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(c) and 12(h)(3). Defendant’s motion
6
is scheduled to be heard by the Court on February 8, 2013.
7
2. In light of holiday schedules and attorney absences, the parties have agreed to give
8
each side additional time to file their respective opposition and reply papers.
9
3. Accordingly, the parties have agreed to extend Plaintiff’s deadline to oppose the
10
motion from January 4, 2011, to January 11, 2013; and agreed to extend
11
Defendant’s deadline to reply to Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion from January
12
11, 2013, to January 25, 2013.
13
4. Under the proposed schedule, the Court will have the fully briefed motion by
14
January 25, 2013, two weeks before the February 8, 2013 hearing date.
15
16
Dated: January 2, 2012
KELLER GROVER LLP
17
18
By:
19
20
21
Dated: January 2, 2012
/s/ Jade Butman_________________
Jade Butman
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT SANTIAGO
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
22
23
By:
24
25
/s/ Eric Meckley_________________
Eric Meckley
Attorneys for Defendant
ARAMARK UNIFORM & CAREER
APPAREL, LLC
26
27
28
1
DB1/ 72653195.1
STIPLUATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE
(CASE NO. CV 12-4462 JSW)
Case3:12-cv-04462-JSW Document26 Filed01/02/13 Page3 of 3
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
The Parties’ requested modification of the briefing schedule is hereby GRANTED.
3
Plaintiff shall file his opposition on or before January 11, 2013. Defendant shall file its reply on
4
or before January 25, 2013.
5
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
January 3, 2013
Dated: _______________________________
_______________________________
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
DB1/ 72653195.1
STIPLUATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE
(CASE NO. CV 12-4462 JSW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?