Holmlund v. Astrue
Filing
21
ORDER APPROVING 20 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Gayle Y. Holmlund. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/3/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2013)
Case3:12-cv-04481-EMC Document20 Filed07/03/13 Page1 of 2
(650)579-4665
NO
A
H
ER
hen
rd M. C
LI
RT
dwa
Judge E
R NIA
VED
APPRO
FO
UNIT
ED
July 3, 2013
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
Case3:12-cv-04481-EMC Document20 Filed07/03/13 Page2 of 2
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Case3:12-cv-04481-EMC Document20-1 Filed07/03/13 Page1 of 1
1
HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488)
2
3
6
1055 Lincoln Avenue
Post Office Box 5025
San Jose, California 95150-5025
Telephone: (408) 295-7755
Facsimile: (408) 295-7444
7
/jgl
8
Attorney for Plaintiff
4
5
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
) No.: 3:12-cv-04481 EMC
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
)
)
)
)
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Commissioner, Social Security Administration, )
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
GAYLE Y. HOLMLUND,
HARVEY P. SACKETT, attorney for Plaintiff, hereby certifies that commensurate with
the filing of this document, service for the commencement of this action is being effectuated upon
the persons whose name appears on the attached Proof of Service.
24
25
Dated: July 3, 2013
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
/s/
HARVEY P. SACKETT
Attorney for Plaintiff
GAYLE Y. HOLMLUND
Case3:12-cv-04481-EMC Document20-2 Filed07/03/13 Page1 of 1
1
PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL
2
[Fed. R. Civ. P. 4]
3
4
5
6
On July 3, 2013, I served the enclosed Notice and Proposed Order of Substitution of
Counsel via First Class Mail, to:
Ms. Gayle Y. Holmlund
801 Fairfield Road, Apt. #1
Burlingame, California 94010
7
8
9
10
I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct.
/s/
JUANITA G. LOPEZ
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE AND PROPOSED ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
HOLMLUND v. COLVIN – CASE NUMBER: 3:12-cv-04481 EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?