Holmlund v. Astrue

Filing 21

ORDER APPROVING 20 Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Gayle Y. Holmlund. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/3/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-04481-EMC Document20 Filed07/03/13 Page1 of 2 (650)579-4665 NO A H ER hen rd M. C LI RT dwa Judge E R NIA VED APPRO FO UNIT ED July 3, 2013 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S Case3:12-cv-04481-EMC Document20 Filed07/03/13 Page2 of 2 N F D IS T IC T O R C Case3:12-cv-04481-EMC Document20-1 Filed07/03/13 Page1 of 1 1 HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488) 2 3 6 1055 Lincoln Avenue Post Office Box 5025 San Jose, California 95150-5025 Telephone: (408) 295-7755 Facsimile: (408) 295-7444 7 /jgl 8 Attorney for Plaintiff 4 5 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ) No.: 3:12-cv-04481 EMC ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. ) ) ) ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, ) ) ) Defendant. ) ) GAYLE Y. HOLMLUND, HARVEY P. SACKETT, attorney for Plaintiff, hereby certifies that commensurate with the filing of this document, service for the commencement of this action is being effectuated upon the persons whose name appears on the attached Proof of Service. 24 25 Dated: July 3, 2013 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE /s/ HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff GAYLE Y. HOLMLUND Case3:12-cv-04481-EMC Document20-2 Filed07/03/13 Page1 of 1 1 PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL 2 [Fed. R. Civ. P. 4] 3 4 5 6 On July 3, 2013, I served the enclosed Notice and Proposed Order of Substitution of Counsel via First Class Mail, to: Ms. Gayle Y. Holmlund 801 Fairfield Road, Apt. #1 Burlingame, California 94010 7 8 9 10 I declare under penalty of perjury that the above is true and correct. /s/ JUANITA G. LOPEZ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 NOTICE AND PROPOSED ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL HOLMLUND v. COLVIN – CASE NUMBER: 3:12-cv-04481 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?