Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Coolit Systems Inc

Filing 140

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 139 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation Regarding Plaintiffs' Claim Construction Reply Brief Page Limit; Proposed Order filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek A/S. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/18/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2013)

1

[All Counsel Listed on Signature Page]

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11

ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S,

12
13
14

CASE NOS. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC and
3:13-CV-00457-JST

Plaintiffs,
v.
COOLIT SYSTEMS INC.,

15

STIPULATION REGARDING
PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
REPLY BRIEF PAGE LIMIT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

Defendant.

16
17

ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S,
Plaintiffs,

18
19
20
21

v.

Date: November 25-26, 2013
Time: 2:30 p.m.
Courtroom: 5, 17th Floor
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

COOLER MASTER CO., LTD. AND COOLER
MASTER USA INC.,
Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM
CONSTR. REPLY BRIEF PAGE LIMIT
CASE NOS. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC, 3:13-CV-00457-JST

1

Plaintiffs Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S (“Plaintiffs”) filed an opening claim

2

construction brief regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,240,362 and 8,245,764 on September 23, 2013

3

(Dkt. 127). Defendants CoolIT Systems Inc. and Cooler Master Co., Ltd. and Cooler Master

4

USA Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”), submitted two separate responsive briefs on October 15,

5

2013 (Dkt. 136, 137), totaling a combined 37 pages. Local Rule 7-4 limits reply briefs to 15

6

pages each absent an express order from the Court.

7

Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate, with the Court’s permission, that Plaintiffs

8

may file a single combined reply brief not to exceed 25 pages, instead of two separate reply

9

briefs of up to 15 pages each. Plaintiffs believe that this will minimize repetition and result in

10
11
12

fewer pages for the Court to review.
By his signature below, counsel for Plaintiffs attests that counsel for Defendants concur
in the filing of this Stipulation.

13
14

Dated: October 17, 2013

FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

15
16

By:

/s/ Robert F. McCauley
Robert F. McCauley

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665)
[e-mail]
Holly Atkinson (SBN 286546)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
Tel:
[phone]
Fax:
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Asetek A/S and Asetek Holdings, Inc.

25
26
27
28
1

STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM
CONSTR. REPLY BRIEF PAGE LIMIT
CASE NOS. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC, 3:13-CV-00457-JST

1

Dated: October 17, 2013

BLANK ROME LLP

2
By:

/s/ Joel Dion
Joel Dion

3
4

COOLEY LLP
HEIDI L. KEEFE (178960)
([e-mail])
DANIEL J. KNAUSS (267414)
([e-mail])
Five Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Telephone:[phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5
6
7
8
9

DENNIS McCOOE
([e-mail])
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
KATHERINE BARECCHIA
([e-mail])
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
JOEL DION ([e-mail])
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
BLANK ROME LLP
One Logan Square
130 North 18th Street
Philadelphia. PA 19103
Telephone:[phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Defendant
CoolIT Systems, Inc.

18
19

Dated: October 17, 2013

ALSTON & BIRD LLP

20
By:

/s/ Elizabeth H. Rader
Elizabeth H. Rader

21
22
23
24

Yitai Hu (SBN 248085)
Elizabeth H. Rader (SBN 184963)
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150
Menlo Park, CA 94025-4008
Telephone:[phone]

25
26
27

Celine Liu (SBN 268990)
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
The Atlantic Building
950 F Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004-1404

28
2

STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM
CONSTR. REPLY BRIEF PAGE LIMIT
CASE NOS. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC, 3:13-CV-00457-JST

1

Telephone:[phone]

2

Attorneys for Defendant
COOLER MASTER CO., LTD. and
COOLER MASTER USA INC.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3

STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM
CONSTR. REPLY BRIEF PAGE LIMIT
CASE NOS. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC, 3:13-CV-00457-JST

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, the Stipulation is GRANTED.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

R NIA

United States District Judge
Northern District of California
n
M. Che
Edward
Judge

FO

RT

9

DERED
SO OR
S The Honorable Edward M. Chen
IT I

NO

8

_________________________________

10

A

H

ER

LI

7

UNIT
ED

6

10/18/13

Dated: ___________________

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

5

S

4

N

11

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

STIPULATION; [PROPOSED] ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIM
CONSTR. REPLY BRIEF PAGE LIMIT
CASE NOS. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC, 3:13-CV-00457-JST