Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Coolit Systems Inc

Filing 28

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 22 MOTION to Dismiss 20 MOTION to Stay Pending Outcome of Inter Partes Reexaminations filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Responses due by 11/23/2012. Replies due by 12/7/2012.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/8/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

COOLEY LLP
HEIDI L. KEEFE (178960)
([e-mail])
DANIEL J. KNAUSS (267414)
([e-mail])
Five Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

ROBERT F. McCAULEY (162056)
([e-mail])
TINA E. HULSE (232936)
([e-mail])
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

DENNIS McCOOE
([e-mail])
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
KATHERINE BARECCHIA
([e-mail])
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
JOEL DION ([e-mail])
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
BLANK ROME LLP
One Logan Square
130 North 18th Street
Philadelphia. PA 19103
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and
ASETEK A/S

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Defendant
CoolIT Sysytems, Inc.

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19
ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S,

CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC

20
Plaintiffs,
21
v.
22
COOLIT SYSTEMS INC.,
23
Defendant.

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIMES FOR RESPONSES
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY
PENDING REEXAMINATIONS
[DKT. 20] AND MOTION TO DISMISS
PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6)
[DKT. 22];

24
[PROPOSED] ORDER
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
RESPONSES TO COOLIT MOTIONS
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC

1

On October 26, 2012, Defendant CoolIT Systems Inc. (“CoolIT”) filed a Motion to Stay the

2

Civil Action Pending the Outcome of the Inter Partes Reexaminations of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,240,362

3

and 8,245,764 [Dkt. 20] and a Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) [Dkt. 22].

4

CoolIT noticed both motions for hearing on January 17, 2013. Plaintiffs Asetek Holdings, Inc. and

5

Asetek A/S’s (collectively, “Asetek”) oppositions to CoolIT’s motions are currently due on

6

November 9, 2012.

7

Lead counsel for Asetek is currently at trial, which is scheduled to last at least through

8

November 9, 2012, but will likely proceed into the following week. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-

9

2(a) and 7-12, the parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to a request for

10

an order extending the time for Asetek to respond to both of CoolIT’s motions by two weeks, from

11

November 9, 2012, up to and including November 23, 2012. Because of a previously scheduled

12

vacation of CoolIT’s counsel, the parties further stipulate to a request for an order extending the time

13

for CoolIT’s replies to Asetek’s oppositions by one week, from November 30, 2012, up to and

14

including December 7, 2012. No changes to the noticed hearing date are necessary in light of these

15

changes.

16

By his signature below, counsel for Plaintiffs attests that counsel for Defendant concurs in

17

the filing of this stipulation.

18

Dated: November 7, 2012

19

Respectfully submitted,
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

20
21

By:

22

/s/ Robert F. McCauley
Robert F. McCauley
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Asetek A/S and Asetek Holdings, Inc.

23
24

Dated: November 7, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

25

BLANK ROME LLP

26

By:

27
28

/s/ Katherine Pauley Barecchia
Katherine Pauley Barecchia
Attorneys for Defendant
CoolIT Systems Inc.

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
RESPONSES TO COOLIT MOTIONS
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

UNIT
ED

RT
U
O

8th
Dated: November __, 2012

RT

8

dwa
Judge E

ER

H

9
10

hen

rd M. C

NO

7

FO

6

R NIA

ED
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
ORDER
O District Judge
UnitedIStates
IT S S
Northern District of California

5

LI

4

S

3

A

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE
RESPONSES TO COOLIT MOTIONS
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC