Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Coolit Systems Inc

Filing 281

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Motions terminated as moot: 241 MOTION in Limine No. 1 to Preclude Defendant CoolIT Systems, Inc. From Contending That Asetek is Not Entitled to Damages From January 1 to January 21, 2013 filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek Danmark A/S, 237 MOTION in Limine No. 1 to Preclude Argument or Testimony Related to Copying filed by Coolit Systems Inc, 242 MOTION in Limine No. 2 to Preclude Reexamination Evidence or Argum ent filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek Danmark A/S, 238 MOTION in Limine No. 2 to Preclude Argument that Conduct Outside the U.S. Supports Infringement filed by Coolit Systems Inc, 223 MOTION in Limine Plaintiffs Aset ek Holdings Inc.'s and Asetek A/S's Early Motion In Limine and Daubert Motion filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek Danmark A/S, 280 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Dismissal of Action With Prejudice; Proposed Ord er filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek Danmark A/S, 243 MOTION in Limine No. 3 to Preclude CoolIT From Mischaracterizing the Court's Construction of "Reservoir" filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek Danmark A/S. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/9/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2015)

1
2
3
4
5

Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
[e-mail]
Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

6
7

Attorneys for Plaintiffs ASETEK HOLDINGS,
INC. and ASETEK A/S

8
9
10
11

COOLEY LLP
HEIDI L. KEEFE (178960)
([e-mail])
DANIEL J. KNAUSS (267414)
([e-mail])
Five Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
DENNIS McCOOE
([e-mail])
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
BLANK ROME LLP
One Logan Square
130 North 18th Street
Philadelphia. PA 19103
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
COOLIT SYSTEMS INC.

12
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17

ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S,
Plaintiffs and Counterclaim
Defendants,

18
19
20
21
22
23

v.

CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

COOLIT SYSTEMS INC.,
Defendant and
Counterclaim Plaintiff.
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen

24
25
26
27
28
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC

1

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c), Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants

2

Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S (“Asetek”) and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff CoolIT

3

Systems Inc., (“CoolIT”) stipulate that this action (i.e., all claims and counterclaims) is dismissed

4

with prejudice in its entirety. Magistrate Judge Grewal, or in his absence, the Northern District of

5

California, will retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ confidential settlement agreement (the

6

terms of which are incorporated herein by reference). Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees

7

and costs.

8

The parties further note for the record that the named plaintiff “Asetek A/S” is currently

9

known as Asetek Danmark A/S and that references to “Asetek A/S” in this stipulation and proposed

10
11
12

order refer to the corporate entity currently known as “Asetek Danmark A/S.”
By his signature below, counsel for Asetek attests under penalty of perjury that counsel for
CoolIT concurs in the filing of this document.

13
14

Dated: February 6, 2015

Respectfully submitted,
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

15
16

By:

17
18

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant
Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S

19
20

/s/Robert F. McCauley
Robert F. McCauley

Dated: February 6, 2015

COOLEY LLP

21
22
23

By:

/s/Daniel J. Knauss
Daniel J. Knauss
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff
CoolIT Systems Inc.

24
25
26
27
28
1

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF ALL PARTIES, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN:

3

This action (i.e., all claims and counterclaims) is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, with

4

Magistrate Judge Grewal, or in his absence, the Northern District of California, retaining jurisdiction

5

to enforce the parties’ confidential settlement agreement (the terms of which are incorporated herein

6

by reference). Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs.

ER

H

14
15

R NIA

dwar
Judge E

FO

RT

13

en

d M. Ch

NO

12

LI

11

The Honorable Edward M. Chen
ED
ORDER
O District Judge
United IS S
IT States
Northern District of California

A

10

RT
U
O

9

9

Dated: February __ 2015

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
________________________________________

S

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

UNIT
ED

7

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC