Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Coolit Systems Inc
Filing
281
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Motions terminated as moot: 241 MOTION in Limine No. 1 to Preclude Defendant CoolIT Systems, Inc. From Contending That Asetek is Not Entitled to Damages From January 1 to January 21, 2013 filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek Danmark A/S, 237 MOTION in Limine No. 1 to Preclude Argument or Testimony Related to Copying filed by Coolit Systems Inc, 242 MOTION in Limine No. 2 to Preclude Reexamination Evidence or Argum ent filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek Danmark A/S, 238 MOTION in Limine No. 2 to Preclude Argument that Conduct Outside the U.S. Supports Infringement filed by Coolit Systems Inc, 223 MOTION in Limine Plaintiffs Aset ek Holdings Inc.'s and Asetek A/S's Early Motion In Limine and Daubert Motion filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek Danmark A/S, 280 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Dismissal of Action With Prejudice; Proposed Ord er filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek Danmark A/S, 243 MOTION in Limine No. 3 to Preclude CoolIT From Mischaracterizing the Court's Construction of "Reservoir" filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek Danmark A/S. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/9/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
robert.mccauley@finnegan.com
Jeffrey D. Smyth (SBN 280665)
jeffrey.smyth@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
Tel: (650) 849-6600
Fax: (650) 849-6666
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiffs ASETEK HOLDINGS,
INC. and ASETEK A/S
8
9
10
11
COOLEY LLP
HEIDI L. KEEFE (178960)
(hkeefe@cooley.com)
DANIEL J. KNAUSS (267414)
(dknauss@cooley.com)
Five Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Telephone:
(650) 843-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 849-7400
DENNIS McCOOE
(mccooe@blankrome.com)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
BLANK ROME LLP
One Logan Square
130 North 18th Street
Philadelphia. PA 19103
Telephone:
(215) 569-5580
Facsimile:
(215) 832-5580
Attorneys for Defendant
COOLIT SYSTEMS INC.
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S,
Plaintiffs and Counterclaim
Defendants,
18
19
20
21
22
23
v.
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
COOLIT SYSTEMS INC.,
Defendant and
Counterclaim Plaintiff.
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
24
25
26
27
28
REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
1
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c), Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants
2
Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S (“Asetek”) and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff CoolIT
3
Systems Inc., (“CoolIT”) stipulate that this action (i.e., all claims and counterclaims) is dismissed
4
with prejudice in its entirety. Magistrate Judge Grewal, or in his absence, the Northern District of
5
California, will retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ confidential settlement agreement (the
6
terms of which are incorporated herein by reference). Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees
7
and costs.
8
The parties further note for the record that the named plaintiff “Asetek A/S” is currently
9
known as Asetek Danmark A/S and that references to “Asetek A/S” in this stipulation and proposed
10
11
12
order refer to the corporate entity currently known as “Asetek Danmark A/S.”
By his signature below, counsel for Asetek attests under penalty of perjury that counsel for
CoolIT concurs in the filing of this document.
13
14
Dated: February 6, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
15
16
By:
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant
Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S
19
20
/s/Robert F. McCauley
Robert F. McCauley
Dated: February 6, 2015
COOLEY LLP
21
22
23
By:
/s/Daniel J. Knauss
Daniel J. Knauss
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff
CoolIT Systems Inc.
24
25
26
27
28
1
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF ALL PARTIES, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN:
3
This action (i.e., all claims and counterclaims) is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety, with
4
Magistrate Judge Grewal, or in his absence, the Northern District of California, retaining jurisdiction
5
to enforce the parties’ confidential settlement agreement (the terms of which are incorporated herein
6
by reference). Each party shall bear its own attorneys fees and costs.
ER
H
14
15
R NIA
dwar
Judge E
FO
RT
13
en
d M. Ch
NO
12
LI
11
The Honorable Edward M. Chen
ED
ORDER
O District Judge
United IS S
IT States
Northern District of California
A
10
RT
U
O
9
9
Dated: February __ 2015
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
________________________________________
S
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
7
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?