Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Coolit Systems Inc

Filing 39

ORDER RESETTING CMC TO 1/17/13 AT 1:30 P.M. re 38 Notice (Other) filed by Coolit Systems Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/29/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 COOLEY LLP HEIDI L. KEEFE (178960) (hkeefe@cooley.com) DANIEL J. KNAUSS (267414) (dknauss@cooley.com) Five Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 Telephone: (650) 843-5000 Facsimile: (650) 849-7400 ROBERT F. McCAULEY (162056) (robert.mccauley@finnegan.com) TINA E. HULSE (232936) (tina.hulse@finnegan.com) FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER LLP 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 Telephone: (650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 DENNIS McCOOE (mccooe@blankrome.com) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) KATHERINE BARECCHIA (barecchia@blankrome.com) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) JOEL DION (dion-j@blankrome.com) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) BLANK ROME LLP One Logan Square 130 North 18th Street Philadelphia. PA 19103 Telephone: (215) 569-5580 Facsimile: (215) 832-5580 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Attorneys for Defendant CoolIT Systems, Inc. 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S, CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC 20 Plaintiffs, 21 v. 22 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER RESCHEDULING THE DECEMBER 14, 2012 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE COOLIT SYSTEMS INC., 23 [PROPOSED] ORDER Defendant. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC 1 On October 3, 2012, the Court scheduled a Case Management Conference for December 14, 2 2012 (Dkt. 11). On October 26, 2012, Defendant CoolIT Systems Inc. (“CoolIT”) filed a Motion to 3 Stay the Civil Action Pending the Outcome of the Inter Partes Reexaminations of U.S. Patent Nos. 4 8,240,362 and 8,245,764 (Dkt. 20) and a Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) 5 (Dkt. 22). CoolIT noticed both motions for hearing on January 17, 2013. 6 Pursuant to the Court’s October 3, 2012 Order, the parties, through their respective counsel, 7 hereby stipulate to a request for an order rescheduling the Initial Case Management Conference for 8 January 17, 2013, with the understanding that disclosures under the Patent Local Rules will remain 9 keyed off of the original December 14, 2012, Initial Case Management Conference date (with 10 Plaintiffs’ Patent L.R. 3-1 and 3-2 disclosures due on December 28, 2012, and CoolIT’s Patent L.R. 11 3-3 and 3-4 disclosures due February 11, 2013). The parties submit that good cause exists in view of 12 the desirability of consolidating the Case Management Conference with the hearing on CoolIT’s 13 motions set for January 17, 2013. 14 By his signature below, counsel for Defendant attests that counsel for Plaintiffs concurs in 15 the filing of this stipulation. 16 Dated: November 26, 2012 17 Respectfully submitted, COOLEY LLP 18 By: 19 20 21 22 Dated: November 26, 2012 /s/Daniel J. Knauss Daniel J. Knauss Attorneys for Defendant CoolIT Systems Inc. Respectfully submitted, 23 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 24 By: 25 26 /s/Robert F. McCauley Robert F. McCauley Attorneys for Plaintiffs Asetek A/S and Asetek Holdings, Inc. 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 29 Dated: November ___, 2012 S DISTRIC 8 1078737 v1/HN RT 10 dwar Judge E ER H 11 12 en d M. Ch NO 9 DERED SO OR ED IT IS DIFI AS MO R NIA 7 LI UNIT ED 6 TC T Honorable Edward M. Chen The E TAUnited States District Judge Northern District of California RT U O S 5 A 4 The CMC is reset to 1/17/13 at 1:30 p.m. A joint CMC Statement shall be filed by 1/10/13. FO 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER N D IS T IC T R OF C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE - CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?