Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Coolit Systems Inc

Filing 56

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 55 Stipulated Request to Seal Courtroom During Motions Hearing; [Proposed] Order filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek A/S. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/16/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056) robert.mccauley@finnegan.com Tina E. Hulse (SBN 232936) tina.hulse@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304 Tel: (650) 849-6600 Fax: (650) 849-6666 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 COOLEY LLP HEIDI L. KEEFE (178960) (hkeefe@cooley.com) DANIEL J. KNAUSS (267414) (dknauss@cooley.com) Five Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155 Telephone: (650) 843-5000 Facsimile: (650) 849-7400 DENNIS McCOOE (mccooe@blankrome.com) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) KATHERINE BARECCHIA (barecchia@blankrome.com) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) JOEL DION (dion-j@blankrome.com) (admitted Pro Hac Vice) BLANK ROME LLP One Logan Square 130 North 18th Street Philadelphia. PA 19103 Telephone: (215) 569-5580 Facsimile: (215) 832-5580 Attorneys for Defendant CoolIT Systems, Inc. 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 19 20 ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S, 21 22 23 24 Plaintiffs, v. COOLIT SYSTEMS INC., Defendant. CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC STIPULATED REQUEST TO SEAL COURTROOM DURING MOTIONS HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER Date: Time: Courtroom: Judge: January 17, 2013 1:30 p.m. 5, 17th Floor Hon. Edward M. Chen 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO SEAL COURTROOM [PROPOSED] ORDER. CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC 1 As explained in more detail below, the parties to this action hereby submit this stipulated 2 request to seal the courtroom during oral argument on two motions which involve confidential 3 information that was previously filed under seal by Order of the Court. 4 More specifically, Defendant CoolIT Systems Inc. “(“CoolIT”) has filed a motion to stay 5 and a motion to dismiss this action, both set for hearing on January 17, 2013 at 1:30 P.M. 6 CoolIT duly submitted motions and declarations to seal evidence submitted in support of both 7 motions, and the Court granted both motions to seal [Dkt. Nos. 42 and 46]. Plaintiffs Asetek 8 Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S (“Asetek”) also duly submitted a motion and declaration to seal 9 evidence submitted in support of its opposition to CoolIT’s motion to stay, and the Court granted 10 that motion to seal as well [Dkt. No. 45]. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that at the 11 time of the hearing on CoolIT’s motions, the Court reserve this matter for last on its motion 12 calendar and seal the Courtroom before any of the parties’ confidential information is disclosed 13 on the record. 14 15 By his signature below, counsel for Plaintiffs attests that counsel for Defendant concurs in the filing of this Stipulation. 16 17 Dated: January 15, 2013 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 18 19 By: /s/ Robert F. McCauley Robert F. McCauley 20 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Asetek A/S and Asetek Holdings, Inc. 21 22 23 Dated: January 15, 2013 COOLEY LLP 24 By: /s/ Daniel J. Knauss Daniel J. Knauss 25 26 Attorneys for Defendant CoolIT Systems, Inc. 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO SEAL COURTROOM [PROPOSED] ORDER. CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, the Stipulation is GRANTED. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. S UNIT ED 1/16/13 Dated: ___________________ _________________________________ D DERE SO OR 7 ER H 9 LI RT 8 10 FO NO R NIA IT S The Honorable EdwardIM. Chen United States District Judge Northern District of California en d M. Ch e Edwar Judg 6 A 5 RT U O 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA N F D IS T IC T O R C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATION TO SEAL COURTROOM [PROPOSED] ORDER. CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?