Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Coolit Systems Inc
Filing
56
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 55 Stipulated Request to Seal Courtroom During Motions Hearing; [Proposed] Order filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek A/S. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 1/16/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
robert.mccauley@finnegan.com
Tina E. Hulse (SBN 232936)
tina.hulse@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
Tel: (650) 849-6600
Fax: (650) 849-6666
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC.
and ASETEK A/S
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
COOLEY LLP
HEIDI L. KEEFE (178960)
(hkeefe@cooley.com)
DANIEL J. KNAUSS (267414)
(dknauss@cooley.com)
Five Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Telephone:
(650) 843-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 849-7400
DENNIS McCOOE
(mccooe@blankrome.com)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
KATHERINE BARECCHIA
(barecchia@blankrome.com)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
JOEL DION (dion-j@blankrome.com)
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
BLANK ROME LLP
One Logan Square
130 North 18th Street
Philadelphia. PA 19103
Telephone:
(215) 569-5580
Facsimile:
(215) 832-5580
Attorneys for Defendant
CoolIT Systems, Inc.
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
19
20
ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S,
21
22
23
24
Plaintiffs,
v.
COOLIT SYSTEMS INC.,
Defendant.
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
STIPULATED REQUEST TO SEAL
COURTROOM DURING MOTIONS
HEARING; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:
January 17, 2013
1:30 p.m.
5, 17th Floor
Hon. Edward M. Chen
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO SEAL COURTROOM
[PROPOSED] ORDER.
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
1
As explained in more detail below, the parties to this action hereby submit this stipulated
2
request to seal the courtroom during oral argument on two motions which involve confidential
3
information that was previously filed under seal by Order of the Court.
4
More specifically, Defendant CoolIT Systems Inc. “(“CoolIT”) has filed a motion to stay
5
and a motion to dismiss this action, both set for hearing on January 17, 2013 at 1:30 P.M.
6
CoolIT duly submitted motions and declarations to seal evidence submitted in support of both
7
motions, and the Court granted both motions to seal [Dkt. Nos. 42 and 46]. Plaintiffs Asetek
8
Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S (“Asetek”) also duly submitted a motion and declaration to seal
9
evidence submitted in support of its opposition to CoolIT’s motion to stay, and the Court granted
10
that motion to seal as well [Dkt. No. 45]. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that at the
11
time of the hearing on CoolIT’s motions, the Court reserve this matter for last on its motion
12
calendar and seal the Courtroom before any of the parties’ confidential information is disclosed
13
on the record.
14
15
By his signature below, counsel for Plaintiffs attests that counsel for Defendant concurs
in the filing of this Stipulation.
16
17
Dated: January 15, 2013
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
18
19
By:
/s/ Robert F. McCauley
Robert F. McCauley
20
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Asetek A/S and Asetek Holdings, Inc.
21
22
23
Dated: January 15, 2013
COOLEY LLP
24
By:
/s/ Daniel J. Knauss
Daniel J. Knauss
25
26
Attorneys for Defendant
CoolIT Systems, Inc.
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO SEAL COURTROOM
[PROPOSED] ORDER.
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES, the Stipulation is GRANTED.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
UNIT
ED
1/16/13
Dated: ___________________
_________________________________ D
DERE
SO OR
7
ER
H
9
LI
RT
8
10
FO
NO
R NIA
IT S
The Honorable EdwardIM. Chen
United States District Judge
Northern District of California
en
d M. Ch
e Edwar
Judg
6
A
5
RT
U
O
4
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION TO SEAL COURTROOM
[PROPOSED] ORDER.
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?