Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Coolit Systems Inc

Filing 98

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 97 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 93 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment PUBLIC VERSION Stipulated Request for Order Changing Time to Respond to Defendant CoolIT Systems Inc.'s Motion for Par tial Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 93]</i filed by Asetek Holdings, Inc, Asetek A/S, Responses due by 8/23/2013. Replies due by 8/30/2013. Hearing set for 9/19/13. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/13/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2013)

Asetek Holdings, Inc et al v. Coolit Systems Inc

1
2
3
4
5

Doc. 98

Robert F. McCauley (SBN 162056)
[e-mail]
Tina E. Hulse (SBN 232936)
[e-mail]
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

COOLEY LLP
HEIDI L. KEEFE (178960)
([e-mail])
DANIEL J. KNAUSS (267414)
([e-mail])
Five Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiffs ASETEK HOLDINGS,
INC. and ASETEK A/S

DENNIS McCOOE
([e-mail])
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
KATHERINE BARECCHIA
([e-mail])
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
JOEL DION ([e-mail])
(admitted Pro Hac Vice)
BLANK ROME LLP
One Logan Square
130 North 18th Street
Philadelphia. PA 19103
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Defendant
CoolIT Systems Inc.

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

19

ASETEK HOLDINGS, INC. and ASETEK A/S,

20
21
22
23

Plaintiffs,
v.
COOLIT SYSTEMS INC.,

CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANT COOLIT SYSTEMS, INC.’S
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT [DKT. NO. 93]; [PROPOSED]
ORDER

Defendant.

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC

Dockets.Justia.com

1

On August 2, 2013, Defendant CoolIT Systems, Inc. (“CoolIT”) filed a Motion for Partial

2

Summary Judgment to Prevent Asetek’s Double Recovery of Damages and, in the Alternative, for

3

Patent Exhaustion. Dkt. 93. CoolIT noticed the hearing for the motion for September 19, 2013.

4

Plaintiffs Asetek Holdings, Inc. and Asetek A/S’s (collectively, “Asetek”) opposition is currently

5

due on August 16, 2013.

6

Asetek intends to submit a declaration in support of its opposition, but the declarant is

7

currently traveling abroad this week. On August 12, 2013, Asetek’s counsel requested a one-week

8

extension to respond to CoolIT’s motion. Counsel for CoolIT agreed. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules

9

6-2(a) and 7-12, the parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to a request

10

for an order extending the time for Asetek to respond to CoolIT’s motion by one week, from August

11

16, 2013, up to and including August 23, 2013. No changes to the noticed hearing date are

12

necessary in light of this requested extension.

13
14

By his signature below, counsel for Plaintiffs attests that counsel for Defendant concurs in
the filing of this document.

15
16

Dated: August 13, 2013

17

Respectfully submitted,
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP

18
19

By:

/s/ Robert F. McCauley
Robert F. McCauley

20
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Asetek A/S and Asetek Holdings, Inc.

21
22
23

Dated: August 13, 2013

COOLEY LLP

24
25

By:

/s/ Daniel J. Knauss
Daniel J. Knauss

26

Attorneys for Defendant
CoolIT Systems Inc.

27
28
1

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3

7

RT

9

H

ER

LI

NO

8

10
11

FO

The Honorable EdwardERED
M. Chen
O ORD
T IS SDistrict Judge
I
United States
Northern District of California
. Chen
dward M
Judge E

6

R NIA

________________________________________

UNIT
ED

13
Dated: August __, 2013

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

5

S

4

A

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04498-EMC