Danisco US, Inc v. Novozymes A/S et al

Filing 62

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/18/14. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Tracey B. Davies (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Michael A. Valek (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
2100 McKinney Avenue Suite 1100
Dallas, TX 75201-6912
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 214.571.2900

David K. Tellekson (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Ewa M. Davison (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
1191 Second Avenue, 10th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 206.389.4511

H. Mark Lyon (CSB No. 162061)
[e-mail]
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
1881 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1211
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.849.5333

Virginia K. Demarchi (CSB No. 168633)
[e-mail]
FENWICK & WEST LLP
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.938.5200

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Danisco US Inc.

Attorneys for Defendants
Novozymes A/S and
Novozymes North America, Inc.

10
11
12
13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

DANISCO US INC.,

Case No. 3:12-cv-04502-RS

Plaintiff,
v.
NOVOZYMES A/S and NOVOZYMES,
NORTH AMERICA, INC.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE

Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1

CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04502-RS

1

Before the Court is the parties’ Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice. Plaintiff Danisco US

2

Inc. (“Danisco”) and Defendants Novozymes A/S and Novozymes North America, Inc. (collectively,

3

“Novozymes”), having reached a settlement of this dispute, stipulate and agree that the above-

4

captioned case, including all claims, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses, shall be dismissed as to

5

all parties with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

6

Each party will bear its own respective costs and attorneys’ fees associated with this action.

7
8

Having considered the papers submitted, the Court hereby DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE
the above-captioned case, including all claims, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses.

9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED THIS ______________ day of ________________________, 2014.
18th
November

12
13
14
15

________________________________
The Honorable Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

2

CASE NO. 3:12-CV-04502-RS