Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al v. D&L Elite Investments, LLC et al

Filing 170

DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on July 28, 2014. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.; and THE BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION, ) Case No. 12-cv-04516-SC ) ) JUDGMENT ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) ) D&L ELITE INVESTMENTS, LLC; BAY ) INTERNATIONAL; BILLY DENG; and ) WEISHEN LUO, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) 17 18 19 In accordance with the Court's concurrently filed Order 20 granting Plaintiffs' motions to strike, enter default, and enter 21 default judgment, it is hereby ORDERED that Default Judgment in 22 this action shall be entered in favor of Plaintiffs Stanley Black & 23 Decker, Inc. and The Black & Decker Corporation and against 24 Defendants Billy Deng, Weishen Luo, and D&L Elite Investments, LLC. 25 The Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES as follows: 26 27 28 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 1331, 1338(a), and 1367(a). 1 2 2. pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1391. 3 4 Venue is proper in the Northern District of California 3. Defendants D&L Elite Investments, LLC, Billy Deng, and the jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to and in 7 accordance with the laws of the State of California, the 8 United States District Court Weishen Luo (collectively, "Defendants") are subject to 6 For the Northern District of California 5 United States Constitution, and Rule 4 of the Federal 9 Rules of Civil Procedure. 10 4. Plaintiffs are the owners of the following trademarks and 11 trade dress (collectively, the "DeWalt Trademarks"), 12 which are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark 13 Office: 14 a. Registered Trademark No. 1,734,403; 15 b. Registered Trademark No. 1,734,404; 16 c. Registered Trademark No. 3,064,666; and 17 d. Registered Trademark No. 3,066,699. 18 5. Defendants are liable jointly and severally to Plaintiffs 19 for: 20 a. Section 1117(c)(2); 21 22 b. c. litigation costs in an amount to be proved pursuant to 25 26 post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1961(a); 23 24 $1,252,290 in statutory damages under 15 U.S.C. d. Civil Local Rule 54-1(a); and attorney's fees pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 27 Section 1117(a) in an amount to be proved pursuant 28 to the Civil Local Rules. 2 1 6. Plaintiffs shall be entitled to recover the following 2 sanctions already awarded by the Court in the following 3 amounts on these days: 4 a. $43,758 awarded on July 19, 2013 as sanctions for 5 violating the temporary restraining order and 6 preliminary injunction, see ECF No. 78 ("Contempt 7 Order"); b. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 Reasonable fees of $87,932 and costs of $2,030 awarded in connection with Defendants' violation of 9 10 the temporary restraining order and preliminary 11 injunction, see Contempt Order, ECF No. 85 ("Keats 12 Decl."); and c. 13 $26,124.42 in fees and costs imposed by Judge Beeler 14 on February 24, 2014 as a sanction for discovery 15 abuses, see ECF No. 146. 16 7. The Court hereby permanently enjoins Defendants, their 17 agents, servants, employees, representatives, successors, 18 and assigns, and all persons, firms, or corporations in 19 active concert or participation with any of Defendants, 20 from: 21 a. directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiffs' 22 trademarks and trade dress as described above in any 23 manner including generally, but not limited to, 24 copying, distributing, advertising, selling, and/or 25 offering for sale any merchandise that infringes 26 Plaintiffs' trademarks or trade dress including 27 without limitation Defendants' infringing goods, and 28 specifically distributing, advertising, selling, or 3 1 offering for sale unauthorized copies of the DeWalt 2 Trademarks or the DeWalt trade dress or any other 3 unauthorized goods that picture, reproduce, or 4 utilize the likenesses of or which copy or bear a 5 substantial similarity to any of Plaintiffs' 6 trademarks and trade dress; or 7 b. engaging in any conduct that tends falsely to United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 represent that, or is likely to confuse, mislead, or 9 deceive purchasers, Defendants' customers, or 10 members of the public to believe that, the actions 11 of Defendants, the infringing products sold by 12 Defendants, or Defendants themselves are connected 13 with Plaintiffs, are sponsored, approved, or 14 licensed by Plaintiffs, or are in some way connected 15 or affiliated with Plaintiffs; 16 c. affixing, applying, annexing, or using in connection 17 with the manufacture, distribution, advertising, 18 sale, and/or offering for sale or other use of any 19 goods or 20 representation, including words or other symbols, 21 tending to falsely describe or represent such goods 22 as being those of Plaintiffs; 23 d. services, a false description or diluting and infringing the DeWalt Trademarks and 24 DeWalt trade dress and damaging Plaintiffs' 25 goodwill, reputations, and businesses; 26 e. effecting assignments or transfers, forming new 27 entities or associations or utilizing any other 28 device for the purpose of circumventing or otherwise 4 1 avoiding the prohibitions set forth in subparagraphs 2 a-d, above. 3 8. Defendants are required to deliver for destruction to 4 Plaintiffs all unauthorized materials bearing any of the 5 DeWalt Trademarks in association with unauthorized goods 6 or services. 7 9. The Court reserves and retains jurisdiction of the United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 subject matter of this case and of the parties hereto for 9 the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Judgment and 10 Permanent Injunction. 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED. 13 14 Dated: July 28, 2014 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?