Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al v. D&L Elite Investments, LLC et al
Filing
170
DEFAULT JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on July 28, 2014. (sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC.;
and THE BLACK & DECKER
CORPORATION,
) Case No. 12-cv-04516-SC
)
) JUDGMENT
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
D&L ELITE INVESTMENTS, LLC; BAY )
INTERNATIONAL; BILLY DENG; and )
WEISHEN LUO,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
17
18
19
In accordance with the Court's concurrently filed Order
20
granting Plaintiffs' motions to strike, enter default, and enter
21
default judgment, it is hereby ORDERED that Default Judgment in
22
this action shall be entered in favor of Plaintiffs Stanley Black &
23
Decker, Inc. and The Black & Decker Corporation and against
24
Defendants Billy Deng, Weishen Luo, and D&L Elite Investments, LLC.
25
The Court hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES, and DECREES as follows:
26
27
28
1.
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of
this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sections 1331, 1338(a),
and 1367(a).
1
2
2.
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1391.
3
4
Venue is proper in the Northern District of California
3.
Defendants D&L Elite Investments, LLC, Billy Deng, and
the jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to and in
7
accordance with the laws of the State of California, the
8
United States District Court
Weishen Luo (collectively, "Defendants") are subject to
6
For the Northern District of California
5
United States Constitution, and Rule 4 of the Federal
9
Rules of Civil Procedure.
10
4.
Plaintiffs are the owners of the following trademarks and
11
trade dress (collectively, the "DeWalt Trademarks"),
12
which are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark
13
Office:
14
a.
Registered Trademark No. 1,734,403;
15
b.
Registered Trademark No. 1,734,404;
16
c.
Registered Trademark No. 3,064,666; and
17
d.
Registered Trademark No. 3,066,699.
18
5.
Defendants are liable jointly and severally to Plaintiffs
19
for:
20
a.
Section 1117(c)(2);
21
22
b.
c.
litigation costs in an amount to be proved pursuant
to
25
26
post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Section 1961(a);
23
24
$1,252,290 in statutory damages under 15 U.S.C.
d.
Civil Local Rule 54-1(a); and
attorney's fees pursuant to 15 U.S.C.
27
Section 1117(a) in an amount to be proved pursuant
28
to the Civil Local Rules.
2
1
6.
Plaintiffs shall be entitled to recover the following
2
sanctions already awarded by the Court in the following
3
amounts on these days:
4
a.
$43,758 awarded on July 19, 2013 as sanctions for
5
violating the temporary restraining order and
6
preliminary injunction, see ECF No. 78 ("Contempt
7
Order");
b.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
Reasonable fees of $87,932 and costs of $2,030
awarded in connection with Defendants' violation of
9
10
the temporary restraining order and preliminary
11
injunction, see Contempt Order, ECF No. 85 ("Keats
12
Decl."); and
c.
13
$26,124.42 in fees and costs imposed by Judge Beeler
14
on February 24, 2014 as a sanction for discovery
15
abuses, see ECF No. 146.
16
7.
The Court hereby permanently enjoins Defendants, their
17
agents, servants, employees, representatives, successors,
18
and assigns, and all persons, firms, or corporations in
19
active concert or participation with any of Defendants,
20
from:
21
a.
directly or indirectly infringing Plaintiffs'
22
trademarks and trade dress as described above in any
23
manner including generally, but not limited to,
24
copying, distributing, advertising, selling, and/or
25
offering for sale any merchandise that infringes
26
Plaintiffs' trademarks or trade dress including
27
without limitation Defendants' infringing goods, and
28
specifically distributing, advertising, selling, or
3
1
offering for sale unauthorized copies of the DeWalt
2
Trademarks or the DeWalt trade dress or any other
3
unauthorized goods that picture, reproduce, or
4
utilize the likenesses of or which copy or bear a
5
substantial similarity to any of Plaintiffs'
6
trademarks and trade dress; or
7
b.
engaging in any conduct that tends falsely to
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
represent that, or is likely to confuse, mislead, or
9
deceive purchasers, Defendants' customers, or
10
members of the public to believe that, the actions
11
of Defendants, the infringing products sold by
12
Defendants, or Defendants themselves are connected
13
with Plaintiffs, are sponsored, approved, or
14
licensed by Plaintiffs, or are in some way connected
15
or affiliated with Plaintiffs;
16
c.
affixing, applying, annexing, or using in connection
17
with the manufacture, distribution, advertising,
18
sale, and/or offering for sale or other use of any
19
goods or
20
representation, including words or other symbols,
21
tending to falsely describe or represent such goods
22
as being those of Plaintiffs;
23
d.
services, a false description or
diluting and infringing the DeWalt Trademarks and
24
DeWalt trade dress and damaging Plaintiffs'
25
goodwill, reputations, and businesses;
26
e.
effecting assignments or transfers, forming new
27
entities or associations or utilizing any other
28
device for the purpose of circumventing or otherwise
4
1
avoiding the prohibitions set forth in subparagraphs
2
a-d, above.
3
8.
Defendants are required to deliver for destruction to
4
Plaintiffs all unauthorized materials bearing any of the
5
DeWalt Trademarks in association with unauthorized goods
6
or services.
7
9.
The Court reserves and retains jurisdiction of the
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
subject matter of this case and of the parties hereto for
9
the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Judgment and
10
Permanent Injunction.
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED.
13
14
Dated: July 28, 2014
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?