Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al v. D&L Elite Investments, LLC et al
Filing
207
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Responses due by 1/12/2016. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 29, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC., et
al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
9
Case No. 12-cv-04516-SC (JST)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
Re: ECF No. 200, 205
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
D&L ELITE INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
This order concerns an Ex Parte Application filed by Plaintiffs requesting that the Court
13
release an Asset Restraining Order on bank accounts connected to Defendants in order for them to
14
collect the judgment obtained in this case. ECF No. 200. Pursuant to this Court’s November 16,
15
2015 order, ECF No. 202, Interested Party Yanjuan Luo filed objections on grounds that she was
16
the ex-spouse of Defendant Billy Deng and no longer had any connection with him. ECF No. 203.
17
She requested that the funds in her account remain unaffected. On December 8, 2015, this Court
18
ordered Plaintiffs to file a response. ECF No. 204.
19
In their response, Plaintiffs state that they did not realize Ms. Luo was no longer married to
20
Mr. Deng and do not know whether the funds in Ms. Luo’s account are connected to him. ECF
21
No. 205 at 3. Regardless, they suggest that the Court grant their Ex Parte Application releasing
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Defendants’ bank accounts, upon which they will release the funds in Ms. Luo’s account to her
and then collect only from the other accounts. Id. Plaintiffs do not explain why they wish to
withdraw the money rather than simply leave it in Ms. Luo’s account for her to manage as she
chooses, or why they should have the right to do so.
Accordingly, all interested parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court
should not grant the Ex Parte Application, with the modification that Plaintiffs will not attempt to
collect any money from Ms. Luo’s account in relation to their judgment in this case. Responses, if
1
any, must be filed within fourteen days of the issuance of this order. If no responses are received,
2
the Court will grant Plaintiffs’ application as described above.
3
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 29, 2015
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?