Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al v. D&L Elite Investments, LLC et al

Filing 207

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Responses due by 1/12/2016. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on December 29, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, 8 9 Case No. 12-cv-04516-SC (JST) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. Re: ECF No. 200, 205 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 D&L ELITE INVESTMENTS, LLC, et al., Defendants. This order concerns an Ex Parte Application filed by Plaintiffs requesting that the Court 13 release an Asset Restraining Order on bank accounts connected to Defendants in order for them to 14 collect the judgment obtained in this case. ECF No. 200. Pursuant to this Court’s November 16, 15 2015 order, ECF No. 202, Interested Party Yanjuan Luo filed objections on grounds that she was 16 the ex-spouse of Defendant Billy Deng and no longer had any connection with him. ECF No. 203. 17 She requested that the funds in her account remain unaffected. On December 8, 2015, this Court 18 ordered Plaintiffs to file a response. ECF No. 204. 19 In their response, Plaintiffs state that they did not realize Ms. Luo was no longer married to 20 Mr. Deng and do not know whether the funds in Ms. Luo’s account are connected to him. ECF 21 No. 205 at 3. Regardless, they suggest that the Court grant their Ex Parte Application releasing 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants’ bank accounts, upon which they will release the funds in Ms. Luo’s account to her and then collect only from the other accounts. Id. Plaintiffs do not explain why they wish to withdraw the money rather than simply leave it in Ms. Luo’s account for her to manage as she chooses, or why they should have the right to do so. Accordingly, all interested parties are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not grant the Ex Parte Application, with the modification that Plaintiffs will not attempt to collect any money from Ms. Luo’s account in relation to their judgment in this case. Responses, if 1 any, must be filed within fourteen days of the issuance of this order. If no responses are received, 2 the Court will grant Plaintiffs’ application as described above. 3 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 29, 2015 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?