Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al v. D&L Elite Investments, LLC et al

Filing 71

Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 70 Stipulation.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Anthony M. Keats (Bar No. 123672) akeats@stubbsalderton.com Konrad K. Gatien (Bar No. 221770) kgatien@stubbsalderton.com Stephen C. McArthur (Bar No. 277712) smcarthur@stubbsalderton.com STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP 1453 3rd Street Promenade, Suite 310 Santa Monica, California 90401 Telephone: (310) 746-9802 Facsimile: (310) 746-9822 Attorneys for Plaintiffs STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. and THE BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC., and THE BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION, 15 16 Plaintiffs, Case No.: C 12-04516 SC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER v. 17 18 19 20 21 D&L ELITE INVESTMENTS, LLC, a California limited liability company d/b/a G BAY INTERNATIONAL; BILLY DENG, an individual; WEISHEN LUO, an individual; and JOHN DOES 1-10, inclusive,, Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. C. 12-04516 SC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER 1 2 Having considered the Stipulation to Amend the Scheduling Order submitted by the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby sets the following deadlines: 3 4 Fact Discovery and Deposition Cut-Off: November 15, 2013 5 Expert Discovery Cut-Off: December 13, 2013 6 Last Date Motions can be Heard: February 28, 2014 7 Pretrial Conference: April 4, 2014 (10:00 a.m.) 8 Jury Trial: April 7, 2014 (9:30 a.m.) 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 Dated: June 18, 2013 By: The Honorable Samuel Conti United States District Court Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1Case No. C. 12-04516 SC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?