Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. et al v. D&L Elite Investments, LLC et al
Filing
71
Order by Hon. Samuel Conti granting 70 Stipulation.(sclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Anthony M. Keats (Bar No. 123672)
akeats@stubbsalderton.com
Konrad K. Gatien (Bar No. 221770)
kgatien@stubbsalderton.com
Stephen C. McArthur (Bar No. 277712)
smcarthur@stubbsalderton.com
STUBBS ALDERTON & MARKILES, LLP
1453 3rd Street Promenade, Suite 310
Santa Monica, California 90401
Telephone:
(310) 746-9802
Facsimile:
(310) 746-9822
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC. and
THE BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
STANLEY BLACK & DECKER, INC., and THE
BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION,
15
16
Plaintiffs,
Case No.: C 12-04516 SC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO AMEND THE
SCHEDULING ORDER
v.
17
18
19
20
21
D&L ELITE INVESTMENTS, LLC, a California
limited liability company d/b/a G BAY
INTERNATIONAL; BILLY DENG, an individual;
WEISHEN LUO, an individual; and JOHN DOES
1-10, inclusive,,
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. C. 12-04516 SC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER
1
2
Having considered the Stipulation to Amend the Scheduling Order submitted by
the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby sets the following deadlines:
3
4
Fact Discovery and Deposition Cut-Off:
November 15, 2013
5
Expert Discovery Cut-Off:
December 13, 2013
6
Last Date Motions can be Heard:
February 28, 2014
7
Pretrial Conference:
April 4, 2014 (10:00 a.m.)
8
Jury Trial:
April 7, 2014 (9:30 a.m.)
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
Dated: June 18, 2013
By:
The Honorable Samuel Conti
United States District Court Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1Case No. C. 12-04516 SC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?