Lee v. United States Of America
Filing
27
ORDER GRANTING 26 STIPULATION TO Continue Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 3/22/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/29/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/10/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2013)
Case3:12-cv-04526-JSW Document26-1 Filed01/08/13 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Edward O.C. Ord, Esq. (SBN 52123)
Christopher M. Cook (SBN 281244)
Ord & Norman
233 Sansome Street, Suite 1111
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 274-3800
Facsimile: (415) 274-3838
David B. Porter Jr. (SBN 155347)
Law Offices of David B. Porter
580 California Street, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 283-3270
Facsimile: (415) 283-3272
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Theodore F. Lee
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
THEODORE F. LEE,
15
Plaintiff,
16
v.
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
18
Civil No. CV-12-04526 (JSW)
Defendant.
______________________________
19
20
Having considered Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s Stipulation to Continue the Case
21
Management Conference and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the Case
22
Management Conference scheduled for January 18, 2013 is hereby vacated. A Case
23
Management Conference shall be held on March 29, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 11, 19th
24
Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.
25
Plaintiff(s) shall serve copies of this Order immediately on all parties to this action, and
26
on any parties subsequently joined, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and 5. Following
27
service, plaintiff(s) shall file with the Clerk of the Court a certificate reflecting such service, in
28
1
Case3:12-cv-04526-JSW Document26-1 Filed01/08/13 Page2 of 2
1
2
accordance with Civil L. R. 5-6(a).
The parties shall appear in person through lead counsel to discuss all items referred to in
3
this Order and with authority to enter stipulations, to make admissions and to agree to further
4
scheduling dates.
5
6
The parties shall file a joint case management statement no later than five (5) court days
7
prior to the conference. The joint case management statement shall address all of the topics set
8
forth in the Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District of California - Contents of
9
Joint Case Management Statement, which can be found on the Court’s website located at
10
http://www.cand.uscourts.gov. See N.D. Civ L.R. 16-9. If any one or more of the parties is
11
proceeding without counsel, the parties may file separate case management statements.
12
Separate statements my also address all of the topics set forth in the Standing Order referenced
13
above. Any request to reschedule the date of the conference shall be made in writing, and by
14
stipulation if possible, at least ten (10) calendar days before the date of the conference and must
15
be based upon good cause. In order to assist the Court in evaluating any need for
16
disqualification or recusal, the parties shall disclose to the Court the identities of any person,
17
associations, firms, partnerships, corporations or other entities known by the parties to have
18
either (1) financial interest in the subject matter at issue or in a party to the proceeding; or (2)
19
any other kind of interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.
20
If disclosure of non-party interested entities or persons has already been made as required by
21
Civil L. R. 3-16, the parties may simply reference the pleading or document in which the
22
disclosure was made. In this regard, counsel are referred to the Court's Recusal Order posted
23
on the Court website at the Judges Information link at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
January 9, 2013
Dated: ____________, 2012
_______________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?