Pinterest, Inc. v. Jin

Filing 13

ORDER RE 12 FURTHER CONTINUING POSTPONEMENT OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES PENDING SERVICE ON FOREIGN DEFENDANT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/14/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ANDREW P. BRIDGES (CSB No. 122761) abridges@fenwick.com JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB No. 178058) jwakefield@fenwick.com SEBASTIAN E. KAPLAN (CSB No. 248206) skaplan@fenwick.com ERIN SIMON (CSB No. 268929) esimon@fenwick.com KATHLEEN LU (CSB No. 267032) klu@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415.875.2300 Facsimile: 415.281.1350 Attorneys for PLAINTIFF PINTEREST, INC. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN FRANCISCO NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 15 Pinterest, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Case No.: 12-CV-04586-RS 16 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER CONTINUING POSTPONEMENT OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES PENDING SERVICE ON FOREIGN DEFENDANT 17 v. 18 Qian Jin, 19 Defendant. Judge: The Hon. Richard Seeborg 20 21 22 23 24 For the reasons stated in the Court’s November 15, 2012 Order, the Court FURTHER POSTPONES the Case Management Conference and associated deadlines. The Court DIRECTS Plaintiff to file a status report within 90 days of this Order or within 25 15 days of learning that service of process on Defendant has occurred, whichever occurs first, to 26 enable the Court to issue a new scheduling order if appropriate. 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Case No. 12-CV-04586-RS 1 14 IT IS SO ORDERED this ___ day of February, 2013. 2 3 Hon. Richard Seeborg United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Case No. 12-CV-04586-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?