Pinterest, Inc. v. Jin
Filing
13
ORDER RE 12 FURTHER CONTINUING POSTPONEMENT OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES PENDING SERVICE ON FOREIGN DEFENDANT. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/14/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ANDREW P. BRIDGES (CSB No. 122761)
abridges@fenwick.com
JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB No. 178058)
jwakefield@fenwick.com
SEBASTIAN E. KAPLAN (CSB No. 248206)
skaplan@fenwick.com
ERIN SIMON (CSB No. 268929)
esimon@fenwick.com
KATHLEEN LU (CSB No. 267032)
klu@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415.875.2300
Facsimile:
415.281.1350
Attorneys for PLAINTIFF
PINTEREST, INC.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SAN FRANCISCO
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
Pinterest, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
Case No.: 12-CV-04586-RS
16
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER FURTHER
CONTINUING POSTPONEMENT OF
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND ASSOCIATED DEADLINES
PENDING SERVICE ON FOREIGN
DEFENDANT
17
v.
18
Qian Jin,
19
Defendant.
Judge: The Hon. Richard Seeborg
20
21
22
23
24
For the reasons stated in the Court’s November 15, 2012 Order, the Court FURTHER
POSTPONES the Case Management Conference and associated deadlines.
The Court DIRECTS Plaintiff to file a status report within 90 days of this Order or within
25
15 days of learning that service of process on Defendant has occurred, whichever occurs first, to
26
enable the Court to issue a new scheduling order if appropriate.
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Case No. 12-CV-04586-RS
1
14
IT IS SO ORDERED this ___ day of February, 2013.
2
3
Hon. Richard Seeborg
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SAN FRANCISCO
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Case No. 12-CV-04586-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?