Ramirez et al v. Ghilotti Bros., Inc. et al
Filing
25
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting 18 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. C 12-04590 CRB
JOSE RAMIREZ ET AL.,
v.
GHILOTTI BROS. INC. ET AL.,
15
Defendants.
/
16
Plaintiffs have moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2) for leave to file
17
18
a Second Amended Complaint. Dkt. 18. Defendants argue that the motion should be
19
“denied in part” because many of the amended claims do not “relate back” under Federal
20
Rule of Civil Procedure 15(c), and no private right of action exists to support certain claims.
21
See generally Opp. (dkt. 21). This matter is suitable for disposition without oral argument.
22
See N.D. Cal. Local R. 7-1(b).
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), “[t]he court should freely give leave
23
24
when justice so requires.” Amendment should be granted when it will not cause the
25
opposing party undue prejudice, is not sought in bad faith, and is not an exercise in futility.
26
DCD Programs, Ltd. v. Leighton, 833 F.2d 183, 186 (9th Cir. 1987).
27
//
28
//
//
1
Defendants’ arguments go more to the merits of Plaintiffs’ claims (i.e., whether they
2
are time barred and whether they state a claim) than whether leave to amend is appropriate.
3
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend without prejudice to
4
Defendants’ ability to re-raise its arguments in the context of a motion to dismiss.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: January 10, 2013
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
G:\CRBALL\2012\4590\order re leave to amend.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?