Minden Pictures, Inc. v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Filing 55

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND RESETTING CMC re 54 Joint Case Management Statement filed by Minden Pictures, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 1/9/2014. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/16/2014 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/27/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2013) Modified on 6/28/2013 (bpf, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Christopher Seidman (SBN 98884) Harmon & Seidman LLC 101 South Third Street, Suite 265 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 Tel: (970) 245-9075 Fax: (970) 245-8086 E-mail: chris@harmonseidman.com 7 Robert W. Crockett (SBN 79918) Harmon & Seidman LLC 33 Spindrift Passage Corte Madera, California 94925 Tel: (415) 945-1830 E-mail: robert@harmonseidman.com 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc. 9 Steven D. Zansberg (SBN 177528) Christopher P. Beall (admitted pro hac vice) Michael Beylkin (admitted pro hac vice) Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP 1888 Sherman Street, Suite 370 Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel: (303) 376-2400 Fax: (303) 376-2401 E-mail: szansberg@lskslaw.com cbeall@lskslaw.com mbeylkin@lskslaw.com 5 6 10 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Defendant John Wiley & Sons, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 MINDEN PICTURES, INC., Plaintiff, 19 20 v. 21 JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., 22 23 Defendant. __________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. C12-04601 EMC JOINT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR COMPLETING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO COMPLETE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND RESETTING CMC 24 Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc. (“Minden”) and Defendant John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 25 (“Wiley”) jointly request that the Court extend the deadline for completing a settlement conference 26 in this case. The background to this joint request is as follows: 27 28 JOINT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR COMPLETING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. C12-04601 EMC 1 During a case management conference on December 11, 2012, the Court referred this case 2 to a magistrate judge for a settlement conference and ordered that the settlement conference be 3 completed within 150 days.1 Accordingly, on February 15, 2013, Magistrate Judge Nandor J. 4 Vadas scheduled a settlement conference for April 25, 2013.2 5 On March 21, 2013, Wiley filed a motion to dismiss the complaint.3 On March 22, 2013, 6 Wiley filed a motion to vacate the settlement conference set for April 25, 2013.4 On March 29, 7 2013, the Court issued an Order Granting Extension of Time in Which to Complete Settlement 8 Conference which extended the deadline to complete the settlement conference to June 30, 2013 9 and provided that the date of the conference shall be scheduled with Magistrate Judge Vadas.5 10 The Court heard Wiley’s motion to dismiss on May 9, 2013. The Court ordered that the 11 parties’ cross motions for summary judgment on certain issues addressed in Wiley’s motion to 12 dismiss shall be heard on October 31, 2013.6 The Court also stated that it was “going to leave it to 13 [Judge Vadas’s] judgment as to whether he believes . . . it is worthwhile, makes sense to hold a 14 settlement conference.”7 15 On May 21, 2013 and June 18, 2013, Magistrate Judge Vadas conducted status conferences 16 to discuss the timing of the settlement conference.8 During the June 18, 2013 status conference, in 17 light of the anticipated October 31, 2013 hearing on the cross motions for summary judgment, 18 Magistrate Judge Vadas continued the matter to November 19, 2013 for another status conference 19 to discuss the timing of the settlement conference.9 20 21 1 22 2 23 24 25 26 27 28 Civil Minutes, Doc. 25. Notice of Settlement Conference and Settlement Conference Order, Doc. 28. 3 Doc. 31. 4 Doc. 33. 5 Doc. 36. 6 Civil Minutes, Doc. 48. 7 Doc. 52, Transcript of May 9, 2013 Hearing, at 30:12-15. 8 Docs. 51 and 53. 9 Doc. 53 __________________________________________________________________________________ 2 JOINT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE CASE NO. C12-04601 EMC FOR COMPLETING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 On June 25, 2013, the parties received an e-mail message from Linn Van Meter, Administrative Law Clerk, stating in part: [I]t appears from Judge Chen’s order entered 3/29/13, docket no. 36, that the deadline for holding the settlement conference in this case is June 30, 2013. If another deadline was subsequently established, please inform me of the order which provides for that. Otherwise, Judge Vadas requests that you ask Judge Chen for an extension of time to hold the settlement conference which includes the 11/19/13 date. Accordingly, the parties jointly request that the Court extend the deadline for completing a settlement conference to December 31, 2013. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 DATED: June 26, 2013 Plaintiff Minden Pictures, Inc. by its attorneys, /s/ Robert W. Crockett Robert W. Crockett (SBN 79918) Harmon & Seidman LLC 33 Spindrift Passage Corte Madera, California 94925 Tel: (415) 945-1830 E-mail: robert@harmonseidman.com Christopher Seidman (SBN 98884) Harmon & Seidman LLC 101 South Third Street, Suite 265 Grand Junction, Colorado 81501 Tel: (970) 245-9075 Fax: (970) 245-8086 E-mail: chris@harmonseidman.com 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________ 3 JOINT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE CASE NO. C12-04601 EMC FOR COMPLETING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 DATED: June 26, 2013 Defendant John Wiley & Sons Inc., by its attorneys, /s/ Michael Beylkin Steven D. Zansberg (SBN 177528) Christopher P. Beall (admitted pro hac vice) Michael Beylkin (admitted pro hac vice) Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP 1888 Sherman Street, Suite 370 Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel: (303) 376-2400 Fax: (303) 376-2401 E-mail: szansberg@lskslaw.com cbeall@lskslaw.com mbeylkin@lskslaw.com 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________ 4 JOINT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE CASE NO. C12-04601 EMC FOR COMPLETING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 3 4 5 6 I am a resident of the State of California, over the age of 18 years, and not a party to the above-entitled action. My business address is 33 Spindrift Passage, Corte Madera, California 94925. I hereby certify that on June 26, 2013, I caused the foregoing JOINT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR COMPLETING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE to be filed via the CM/ECF system, which will serve a Notice of Electronic Filing to all counsel of record, including the following: 7 Steven D. Zansberg Christopher P. Beall Michael Beylkin Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, LLP 1888 Sherman Street, Suite 370 Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel: (303) 376-2400 Fax: (303) 376-2401 E-mail: szansberg@lskslaw.com cbeall@lskslaw.com mbeylkin@lskslaw.com 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 I declare under penalty of perjury that I am a member of the bar of this Court and that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 26, 2013, at Corte Madera, California. /s/ Robert W. Crockett 17 Robert W. Crockett (SBN 79918) Harmon & Seidman LLC 33 Spindrift Passage Corte Madera, California 94925 Tel: (415) 945-1830 E-mail: robert@harmonseidman.com 18 19 20 21 R NIA Chen A H ER ard M. FO w Judge Ed LI RT 26 NO 25 RT U O 24 S 23 IT IS SO ORDERED that the deadline to complete settlement conference is extended to 12/31/13. The further CMC is reset from 10/31/13 to 1/16/14 at 10:30 a.m. An updated joint cmc statement shall be filed by 1/9/14. S DISTRICT TE C _____________________________ TA EDWARD M. CHEN ED ORDER IT IS SO IED U.S. DISTRICT JUDGEAS MODIF UNIT ED 22 N F D IS T IC T O R C 27 28 __________________________________________________________________________________ 5 JOINT REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF DEADLINE CASE NO. C12-04601 EMC FOR COMPLETING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?