McDonald et al v. Indymac Mortgage Services et al
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO'S MOTION TO DISMISS; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; DENYING AS MOOT ONEWEST AND DEUTSCHE BANK'S MOTION TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY. The Court continues the hearing date for Wells Fargos motion to September 20, 2013. The Case Management Conference currently scheduled for August 23, 2013, is continued to November 15, 2013. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 16, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/16/2013)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DARRELL MCDONALD, et al.,
No. C 12-4610 MMC
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
INDYMAC MORTGAGE SERVICES, et al.,
ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON
DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO’S
MOTION TO DISMISS; CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
DENYING AS MOOT ONEWEST AND
DEUTSCHE BANK’S MOTION TO
Before the Court is defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s (“Wells Fargo”) motion to
dismiss plaintiff’s second amended complaint, filed August 2, 2013, and currently
scheduled for hearing September 6, 2013. Also before the Court is a motion to dismiss,
filed jointly by defendants OneWest Bank, FSB (“OneWest”) and Deutsche Bank National
Trust Company (“Deutsche Bank”), which motion is noticed for hearing September 20,
2013, and raises, in part, issues similar to those raised by Wells Fargo.
Accordingly, in the interest of judicial economy, the Court hereby CONTINUES the
hearing date for Wells Fargo’s motion to September 20, 2013.
In light of the two pending motions to dismiss, the Case Management Conference
currently scheduled for August 23, 2013, is hereby CONTINUED to November 15, 2013.
The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement by November 8, 2013.
OneWest and Deutsche Bank’s motion to appear telephonically at the August 23, 2013
Case Management Conference is hereby DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 16, 2013
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?